Log In

Browse by Document Type

Depositions (6,483) Court Filings (12,056) FBI Reports (5,300) Emails (894,442) Flight Logs (11,800) Financial (101,237) Photos (147,225) Legal (11,650) Other (98,409)
Recently Indexed Email Addresses Phone Numbers Dates

Court Filings (12,056 documents)

DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00098.png 94% conf · 2,050 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page49 of 77 such as “spa attendants,” are “seasonal” and work only when the club is open, i.e., between November | and Mother’s Day. EXHIBIT T at 72-
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00096.png 94% conf · 2,024 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page47 of 77 366 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (quoting Fleckenstein v. Friedman, 193 N.E. 537, 538 (1934)))). Indeed, it is well settled in New York “that an allege
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00091.png 94% conf · 2,041 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page42 of 77 “pertinent to a good faith anticipated litigation.” 28 N.E.3d at 16. Upon establishing that element, summary judgment for the defendant i
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00094.png 93% conf · 1,879 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page45 of 77 allegations: “I am referring to the statement that was made.” Doc.1 §] 32. Assuming arguendo the statement is defamatory,*° it is absolut
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00085.png 95% conf · 2,211 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page36 of 77 Mr. Barden’s inference from disclosed facts qualifies as “pure opinion,” Steinhilber, 501 N.E.2d at 552. Accordingly, that Mr. Barden cha
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00089.png 94% conf · 2,142 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page40 of 77 trafficking. Viewing the July 2015 statement from the perspective of these reporters and journalists—the only persons who received the Ju
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00087.png 94% conf · 2,225 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page38 of 77 forceful argument that plaintiff's shifting and inconsistent stories about what allegedly happened rendered her inherently unbelievable a
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00080.png 94% conf · 2,199 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page31 of 77 Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts—so not a new individual. The allegations made by Victoria Roberts [sic] against Ghislaine Maxwell are untr
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00090.png 94% conf · 2,057 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page41 of 77 communications “between litigating parties or their attorneys.” Klein v. McGauley, 29. A.D.2d 418, 420 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968), cited with
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00082.png 94% conf · 1,962 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page33 of 77 allegations that would give the media Ms. Maxwell’s response. Jd. The purpose of the prefatory statement was to inform the media-recipien
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00088.png 93% conf · 1,982 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page39 of 77 Doc.37 at 7 (quoting Davis, 22 N.E.3d at 1005). To answer that inquiry, the Court applied the three factors enumerated in Davis. See id.
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00083.png 93% conf · 1,958 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page34 of 77 9920 sexually exploited by Epstein, Prince Andrew and Epstein’s “male peers,” plaintiff made 921 9922 virtually none of what Judge Mar
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00081.png 93% conf · 2,051 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page32 of 77 Mr. Barden, who prepared the January 2015 statement, did not intend the January 2015 statement to be a traditional press release solely t
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00071.png 95% conf · 2,971 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page22 of 77 The rationale for this rule is found in the New York Court of Appeals’ explanation of how an original publisher’s allegedly defamatory st
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00074.png 94% conf · 2,018 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page25 of 77 The New York Court of Appeals reversed. The risk of admitting such evidence, the court held, is the jury may “charge against defendant a
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00073.png 94% conf · 2,136 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page24 of 77 defamatory statement on a party who had no “actual . . . responsibility for the decision to republish” the statement. Jd. A public figur
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00070.png 94% conf · 2,108 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page21 of 77 The email transmitting the statement explained it was “a quotable statement on behalf of Ms Maxwell” and “[nJo further communication wil
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00069.png 94% conf · 2,176 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page20 of 77 “[W]here a defendant ‘had no actual part in composing or publishing,’ he cannot be held liable ‘without disregarding the settled rule of
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00072.png 95% conf · 1,939 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page23 of 77 lies.” As noted, her claims not to have slept with Prince Andrew and to have slept with Prince Andrew are a classic example of an obvious
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00067.png 95% conf · 2,042 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page18 of 77 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323-24 (1986), and Meiri v. Dacon, 759 F.2d 989, 998 (2d Cir. 1985)). Where summary judgment is s
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00059.png 94% conf · 2,088 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page10 of 77 6. Seven years later, on December 30, 2014, Ms. Giuffre moved to join the CVRA action, claiming she, too, had her CVRA rights violated by
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00060.png 92% conf · 2,039 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page11 of 77 said the striking of the “lurid details” was a sanction for Ms. Giuffre’s improper inclusion of them in the motion. See id. at 6-7. 10.
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00063.png 95% conf · 2,043 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page14 of 77 No further communication will be provided by her on this matter. Thanks for your understanding. Best Ross Ross Gow ACUITY Reputation
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00062.png 94% conf · 1,873 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page13 of 77 15. Notably, the other “Jane Doe” who joined plaintiffs motion who alleged she was sexually abused “many occasions” by Epstein was unable
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00057.png 94% conf · 1,669 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page8 of 77 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell moves under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT FACTS The followi
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00050.png 87% conf · 433 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 276, 08/09/2019, 2628224, Page1 of 77 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wenn eee xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MA
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00027.png 95% conf · 2,049 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page22 of 25 pleadings, complaints, and briefs—while supposedly based on underlying evidentiary material—can be misleading. Such documents sometimes
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00029.png 94% conf · 1,020 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page24 of 25 readers may take the reference to “court papers” as some sort of marker of reliability. This would be a mistake. We therefore urge th
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00032.png 89% conf · 435 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 275, 08/09/2019, 2628223, Page1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK cane xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWEL
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00022.png 95% conf · 1,687 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page17 of 25 Although a court’s authority to oversee discovery and control the evidence introduced at trial surely constitutes an exercise of judici
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00017.png 94% conf · 2,012 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page12 of 25 In this case, the District Court erred in several respects.'4 First, it failed to give proper weight to the presumption of access that
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00010.png 95% conf · 1,600 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page5d of 25 recognize the potential damage to privacy and reputation that may accompany public disclosure of hard-fought, sensitive litigation. We
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00014.png 95% conf · 1,426 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page9 of 25 the entire docket. The District Court granted each of these motions to intervene, but denied the related requests to unseal in orders en
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00013.png 94% conf · 1,523 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page8 of 25 future sealing requests. In total, 167 documents—nearly one-fifth of the docket—were filed under seal. These sealed documents include, i
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00012.png 93% conf · 1,508 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page7 of 25 defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter... on its own,” the Florida District Court (Kenneth A. Marra, Ju
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00005.png 95% conf · 1,182 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-1, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE CIRCUIT es Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Foley Square, in the City of New
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00009.png 94% conf · 1,154 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page4 of 25 PAUL G. CASSELL (Sigrid S. McCawley, Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, on the brief), S.J Quinney College of Law, Universi
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00001.png 94% conf · 916 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 271, 08/09/2019, 2628203, Page1 of 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00007.png 94% conf · 749 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 273-2, 08/09/2019, 2628218, Page2 of 25 Vv. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellee.” On Appeal from the United States District Court
DocumentCloud_Epstein_Docs_p00004.png 95% conf · 198 chars
Case 18-2868, Document 272, 08/09/2019, 2628208, Page2 of 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. For the Court: Catherine O’ Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court
DOJ-OGR-00033151.tif 95% conf · 2,640 chars
Barbara Burns SE From: Michael McAuliffe Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:31 AM To: Barbara Burns Subject: RE: Epstein I think, as you suggest, the defendant simply needs to finish his sentence as
DOJ-OGR-00033147.tif 95% conf · 2,930 chars
Page | of 2 Barbara Burns From: Barbara Burns Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 8:49 AM To: ‘Jack Goldberger’ Ce: Michael McAuliffe Subject: RE: Epstein | shared your latest email with Mr. McAuliff
DOJ-OGR-00033121.jpg 93% conf · 1,436 chars
sor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. DATE: February 25, 2008 TOS c/o Lana Belohlavek Office of the State Attorney 401 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 IN RE: STATE OF
DOJ-OGR-00033116.jpg 95% conf · 1,308 chars
07/26/17 sor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. Page 128 of issues in this case. We're going to have lots of reasons to disagree. I'm going to take it over now and I'm going to make c
DOJ-OGR-00032989.jpg 91% conf · 679 chars
sor & Associates ‘ Reporting and Transcription, Inc. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006 CF09454AXx STATE OF FLORIDA, JEFFREY
DOJ-OGR-00032645.jpg 89% conf · 2,015 chars
Date: 11/18/05 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT Page: 4 Time: 11:36:11 Incident Report Program: CMS301L Case No. .. . : 1-05-001263 (Continued) approaching the auto, I observed five occupants inside the
DOJ-OGR-00032627.jpg 80% conf · 1,402 chars
IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA (CRIMINAL DIVISION) CASE NO. OS ~ 230d MMAQ2. I, the Defendant, request a continuance of the arraignment for the following reason(s),: mrs
DOJ-OGR-00032628.jpg 77% conf · 853 chars
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, CRIMINAL DIVISION, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA DIVISION “KK” CASE NO.: STATE OF FLORIDA INFORMATION FOR, +“. __. ss DWLS/C'R NO VALID
DOJ-OGR-00032585.jpg 90% conf · 1,067 chars
NOV-02-2007 FRI 09:22 AM FAX NO, 5618358691 PF. Q2 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, INAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006CFOQ09454A STATE OF FLORIDA vs. . JEFFRE
DOJ-OGR-00032584.jpg 95% conf · 1,163 chars
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, INAND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2006CF009454A STATE OF FLORIDA VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. / AGREED ORDER SCHEDULING CASE
AI Analyst

Following the case?

Get weekly briefings on new documents, redaction analysis, and investigative updates.

Classified
Classified Material
Restricted Access

This archive contains 1.43 million government documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, including materials referenced in active criminal proceedings.

Contents include evidence of sexual abuse, trafficking, and exploitation of minors.

Unauthorized distribution of certain materials may be subject to legal restrictions.

You must be 18 or older to access this archive
By proceeding, you confirm: