Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620 _ Filed 02/25/22 Page3of21
press outlets about his jury service and requested a hearing be held on the matter. Dkt. No. 568.
The letter noted that in the interviews
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620 Filed 02/25/22 Page1of21
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/24/22
United Sta
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document617 Filed 02/24/22 Page2of3
v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995); see also S.E.C. v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222, 232
(2d Cir. 2001) (noting that a “document whic
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document617_ Filed 02/24/22 Page1of3
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document617 Filed 02/24/22 Page3of3
motion then notes, Juror 50 has already said publicly.
Accordingly, no redactions are justified, and the motion should be docketed.
Respec
Case ain memes 6074. FiledCngeah PagPaget4s of 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 605 _ Filed 03/18/13 Page 1 of 41
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMER
Case eae atiatlieeiaiiy ar, eamaemeaeenameniaeidia 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 604 _ Filed 03/16/13 Page 1 of 14
7185 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS 31ST FLOOR
4 NEW YORK, NY 10036-2603
vy. ZUCKERMA
Case ee £95 em aaRanPacPage $2 of 117
wodinon sib NH
MMM NM MM PRP RPP Pee RP Re
O®WNrFOWOA RU SF wWNe Oo
23
CAC3PARC
has stated that you can find that where there has been a split
verdict, as is t
Case ee £O18 FiledGageah PagPagé 45 of 117
i
oOwomo tytn oO & Whe
NNMNNNNR PRP PP Pp eee
MeWNPOWOAWH oO ew he
16
CAC3PARC
MS. DAVIS: Yes, please, your Honor.
Good afternoon, your Honor. I'm glad
Case ileal eteeeaaaiay Var), : eunammeaaeaaeian nae 117
ww omnia nnuvubeWWNYNYPe
NPN N Nh HMR RP RP PPP RP RPP RP PP PP PPP eee
OBW NY OOWWU MOAR HUoO Ss Bw Herod
CAC3PARC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO
Case E20 OSE PANES BOC ENN ER) LOU ORIRA Rag eaue!S ol 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 544 _ Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES
Case eae atiadeieeiaiiy ar <7, unaanenim ania 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 20 of 29
Stephen Gillers
LEGAL AND Reporter, Appellate Judges Conference, Commission on Judi
Case eae atiateitaiay a7 V unammeaenime aaa 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 2 of 29
separate question of whether the motion for a new trial based on the conduct of juror
Case eee ee ee eee EER S et mteBag@aue! 2801 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 522 Filed 04/06/12 Page 1 of 29
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF A
Case eae atiatiteiaiy <7, unaeeenamee areal 117
Page 3
80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 09090
(Cite as: 80 A.D.3d 168, 913 N.Y.S.2d 187)
nite period until further order of this C
Case ieee atiatieeiaiiy ar <<, Snaeeeenieaaeaiia 117
Dao Ss Uo SW he
382
GOVERNMENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit No. Received
DEFENDANT EXHIBITS
Exhibit No, Received
PMD 4 and PMD 27 a. ae de Ripa et Aeteh Saik
Case Fee ee eee RRS CO ORIRAIZB ag Raye! 20 of 117
Wow nu fs wwe
378
C2grdau4
Finally, in the past I asked the parties to brief what
they believed might occur depending upon various rulings by the
Case 1@@ser400336 AécurDatuprent SRLS ae BacPagense of 130
358
Cégrdau4
1 MR. OKULA: Your Honor, we have no other witnesses,
2 As a housekeeping matter, I'd like to move into evidence
¥ Government Ex
Case ce e812 027249 2PaRavyef H27 of 130
355
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein - redirect
i A, Yes,
2 THE COURT: Mr. Schectman?
3 MR. SCHECTMAN: And I take it because you thought it
4 was in conceivable that th
Case ee S469 FiledGaaeah PagPagé $4 of 130
bh
OwnmswnU bw NP
Oe eae See i el lll coll coll oll ec oll oll oe)
OfkWnrPowot nu fswWhy
312
C2grdau2 Brune - cross
REDIRECT EXAMINATION
BY MR. DAVIS:
9.
Case es BO) ee aaa hack age 17 of 130
e
oOWOAaof& Whe
ee
BPWNHrP OW DHRU Bw he
aa
245
C2GFDAU1 Hearing
THE DEPUTY CLERK: Continued case of United States of
America v. Paul Daugerdas.
THE COURT:
Case leaded eteieleaaniay Var <., anaemeameeeaeeiae eel 130
WwwoemetstitIanwosa BWW HMR H
C2GFDAU1 Hearing
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Ve
PA
Case E28 ORS PANS BOC EERO eneeae of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
21 $,7;28:9;305,1.10, |
18:32:15;33:5:34:17,17,
20;35:3,3,20;36:17;
39:20:42: 18;43:2,4:
44:2,9:46:11;
Case TAECIOOS8O- PELTON 70. Fil@dW2/e4/22gePaged 32 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
Page 241
1 INDEX OF EXAMINATION
2 Examination of: Page
3 THERESA MARIE TRZASKOMA
4 Di
Case TASECIDOS8E-EAELITBOOUEA AN O34 Filed@2/e4/22agePageé 36 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, y
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
Cetrdau3 Page 97
1 (Witness excused)
2 THE COURT: Before the defendants cal
Case (:203ct2003380;PAEUmBoctimént 606/201 Filedawyea/22agePage 34 of 67
Xl
PAGE
Exhibit A to Gillers Declaration—
Curriculum Vitae of Stephen Gillers......................00000e A-5852
Affidavit o
Case (203ct2003380; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filedawea/22agehage 34 of 67
ix
PAGE
Exhibit 13 to Trzaskoma Declaration—
Certificate of Disposition from the Criminal Court of the City of
New York, Count
Case €203ct2003380; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filed&wyea/22gePage 32 of 67
x
PAGE
Exhibit 24 to Trzaskoma Declaration—
Order, Conrad v. Manessis, February 5, 2009 ................... A-5212
Exhibit 25
Case €203ct2003380; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filedawea/22agehage 33 of 67
x1
PAGE
Exhibit D to Brune Affidavit—
Email from Viviann Stapp to Randy Kim, March 1, 2011 ........ A-5466
Exhibit E to Bru
Case D20crB0GRR PAECUNBotmnent16166120 1Rildd AIGA 2PagPageSho of 67
Vili
Exhibit 2 to Trzaskoma Declaration—
Juror Questionnaire... cee tent e eens A-4986
Exhibit 3 to Trzaskoma Declaration—
Lette
Case (203ct2003380; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filedawe4a/22,geRage9 of 67
vil
PAGE
GX1002-64 Fax from Lisa Hurley to James D. Beumel,
May 16, 2003........ cece eee ened A-4777
GX1002-122 Letter from Li
Case (203ct200330; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filed&we4a/22,geRageé of 67
iv
PAGE
Transcript—Trial, Day 47, May 23, 2011 ............. 2... cee eee ee A-2637
Transcript—Trial, Day 48, May 25, 2011 ....
Case (203ct200330; PAEUm Boctimént 606/201 Filedswea/22gePage2 of 67
13-1388-cr
IN THE
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
—against—
PAUL M
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document616- Filed 02/24/22 Page 24 of 32
E. This Court should reject the government’s attempt to manufacture a
“Show Hearing”.
To read the government’s brief, one would think
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document616 - Filed 02/24/22 Page 7 of 32
response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for cause”). That’s because, as the
Supreme Court held in United States v.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document616 Filed 02/24/22 Page1of32
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
we ee a ee ee xX
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v : S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAX
1/26/22, 3:30PM Case 1:20-cr-O0@Makihexwellld @Ceays vite fick Demincedpkad dhe WAd A2predatdr ADpay Mal fone
ISEMENT
During the trial Scotty, who works in finance, was seated in the third row of th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 48 of 49
the court to invoke its powers or affect its decisions” stands on a “different footing” than items
merely passed between parties in di
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 47 of 49
Mar. 9, 2020); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 19 Civ. 2552 (LAK) (OTW), 2019 WL 4855039,
at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2019).
Finally, the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 42 of 49
first instance, it held that the district court’s decision not to do so was within its broad discretion.
Id. at 306.
As the foregoing
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page19 of 49
which are relatively easily understood by lawyers and judges.”); Dyer v. Calderon, 151 F.3d 970,
973 (9th Cir. 1998) (“[W]e must be tol
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 16 of 49
and then further show that a correct response would have provided a valid basis for a challenge for
cause.’” Jd. at 815 (quoting McDon
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 12 of 49
ARGUMENT
I. The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record
A. Applicable Law
Federal Rule of Crimina
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page11of 49
service. According to this article, Juror 50 “went into the trial firmly believing that Maxwell was
‘innocent until proven guilty’ and v
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page4of49
discovery and an expansive hearing—requests that present exactly the sort of “evil consequences”
of which the Second Circuit has warned: “
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT |... ee cececeeeccenecnsecneesaeeseeeseenaecnaecaaesaesseeeaeenaeenaessaesaeeseee 1
BACKGROUND
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page3of 49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR RRs Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615 _ Filed 02/24/22 Page1of49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR RRs Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document614 Filed 02/24/22 Page2of12
INTRODUCTION
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (“NACDL”) represents
approximately 40,000 criminal defense lawyers who o
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 614
Filed 02/24/22 Page1of12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Def