Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
10
akat
cae
As}
14
15
16
17
Ve)
1)
20
21
AA
23
24
25
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-2 Filed 01/08/24 Page 13 of 42
12
XGAQGIUc SEALED
in Florida that the "ultimate aim of the a
10
ak
Ne}
13
14
ALIS)
16
wy
18
LD
20
21
22
Pye)
24
25
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-2 Filed 01/08/24 Page 11 of 42
a)
XGAQGIUc SEALED
reasonable, all of those things would be
10
alal,
aly
ak3}
14
ayy
16
AL
a6
AES)
20
2d:
22
23
24
25)
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-2 Filed 01/08/24 Page 6 of 42
XGAQGIUc SEALED
valid discovery requests.
Similar point
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-1 Filed 01/08/24 Page 20 of 42
Because Plaintiff claimed she cannot access her Microsoft account, Ms. Maxwell
subpoenaed Microsoft for the documents. Plaintiff mo
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 11
AO 88A (Rev. 12/13) Subpoena to Testy at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 3)
eee
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d),
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-36 Filed 01/05/24 Page 7 of 10
particularly true when the spectre of this trial’s becoming even more of a media event is factored into
the analysis.‘
Plaintiff a
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 8 of 11
10.
With respect to any Documents withheld on the basis of a privilege, provide a log
consistent with Local Rule 26.2 of the Feder
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-36 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 10
his video deposition is the functional equivalent of an in-person assertion, the distance of travel
required and the expenses which
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-36 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 10
LiButti, 107 F.3d at 123-24 (italics in original). In her motion seeking to present Mr. Epstein’s
assertions of his Fifth Amendment
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-36 Filed 01/05/24 Page 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Virginia L Giuffre,
Plaintiff
Case No. 15-cv-07433-RWS
v.
Ghislaine Ma
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 5 of 11
AO 88A (Rev 12/13) Subpoena to Testfy at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No, 15-cv-07433-RWS
PROOF OF SERVIC
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 11
AO 88A (Rev. 12/13) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Southern District
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 11
Dated: February 6, 2017
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Laura A. Menninger
Laura A. Menninger (LM-1374)
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
HADDON,
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-35 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
errr non nreceermennnrenennennaaennnmeniinaisien X
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 24 of 27
Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev Case Number 1:17-cv-00616-JGK
(S.D.N.Y.). Ransome objects to this Reques
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 25 of 27
Without waiving such objections, all responsive electronic communications in non-party
Sarah Ransome’s possession are attached her
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 26 of 27
In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this
request in that she is a non-party and th
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 27 of 27
the underlying action. Ransome objects to Defendant being permitted to utilize the underlying
action to obtain backdoor discovery
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 23 of 27
In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this
request in that she is a non-party and th
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 22 of 27
that it represents a complete invasion of privacy. A non-party should not be subjected to undue
harassment serving no admissible p
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 18 of 27
(S.D.N.Y.). Ransome objects to this Request as overbroad, harassing, and not calculated to lead
to discoverable evidence relevant
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 20 of 27
allegedly relevant to another Federal Action styled JANE DOE 43 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine
Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff,
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 19 of 27
RESPONSE:
In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this
request in that she is a non-p
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 17 of 27
In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this
request in that she is a non-party and th
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 21 of 27
to discoverable evidence relevant to the Defamation Action. Ransome objects to this Request in
that it represents a complete invas
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 16 of 27
RESPONSE:
In addition to the Preliminary Statement and General Objections, Ransome objects to this
request in that she is a non-p
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 15 of 27
15. All Documents reflecting any money, payment, valuable consideration or other remuneration
received by You from Jeffrey Epstein
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 14 of 27
to discoverable evidence relevant to the Defamation Action. Ransome objects to this Request in
that it represents a complete invas
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 13 of 27
Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff, and Natalya Malyshev Case Number 1:17-cv-00616-JGK
(S.D.N.Y.). Ransome further objects to thi
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 12 of 27
action to obtain backdoor discovery into a separate action entirely unrelated to whether or not
Maxwell defamed Virginia Roberts G
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 10 of 27
and not calculated to lead to discoverable evidence relevant to the Defamation Action. Ransome
objects to this Request in that it
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 27
Specifically, the subpoena served on Ms. Ransome seeks documents that are wholly
irrelevant to the underlying action including prot
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 11 of 27
Without waiving such objections, a copy of non-party Sarah Ransome’s current passport
is attached hereto as RANSOME 000157-000168,
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-31 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Virginia L. Giuffre,
Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS
Vv.
Ghislai
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 16 of 19
promise by Mr. Epstein to help her get into F.I.T. — i.e. the alleged benefit she was promised.
The few documents produced suggest
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 13 of 19
directly to her motivation to fabricate testimony to seek (a substantial amount of) money in in the
Jane Doe 43 litigation. Any co
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 19
I. MS. RANSOME HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE AN APPROPRIATE PRIVILEGE
LOG, THEREBY EFFECTING A WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE
Ms. Ransome has refused
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 3 of 19
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files this Combined Motion to Compel
Non-Party Witness to Produce Documents and Respond
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 7 of 19
26(b)(5)); see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 575-76 (1st Cir.2001) (stating that
a “party that fails to submit a pr
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-30 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 19
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff first identified Sarah Ransome as a witness on January 13, 2016, a mere two
months before trial was scheduled
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-26 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff,
Case No.:
-against- 15-cv-07433-RWS
G
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-23 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff,
Case No.:
-against- 15-cv-07433-RWS
G
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-16 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 10
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”) files her Reply in Support of the Motion
in Limine to Exclude In Toto certain depositio
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-13 Filed 01/05/24 Page 7 of 22
As a result of these efforts to evade service, Ms. Giuffre filed a motion for leave to
proceed by way of alternative service with r
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-13 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 22
ARGUMENT
I. EPSTEIN AND, POTENTIALLY, ESPLIN ARE UNAVAILABLE WITNESSES.
A. Jeffrey Epstein is a Witness who is more than 100 miles
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-13 Filed 01/05/24 Page 5 of 22
Plaintiff Ms. Giuffre respectfully submits this Response in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion in Limine to Exclude in Certain Deposi
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-13 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 0.0... cccccccecscssesessesesssesesesesesescscseseeceeseecsesescaracecaeacecaeseesanac
Plaintiff's
Exhibit JE5
Composite
Plaintiff's Exhibit JE6
Plaintiff's Exhibit JE7
Plaintiff's Exhibit JE8
Plaintiff's Exhibit JE9
Plaintiff's Exhibit
JE10
Plaintiff's Exhibit
JE11
Case 1:15-cv
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-7 Filed 01/05/24 Page 4 of 21
(4) Unavailable Witness. A party may use for any purpose the deposition of a witness,
whether or not a party, if the court finds:
(A
Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1331-7 Filed 01/05/24 Page 8 of 21
Because of his invocation of his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, there actually is
no deposition testimony to designate. Eac