Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Pages of 35
Ms. Maxwell argues that the District Court’s sentence was in error because
(1) its four-point enhancement under USSG Section 3B1.1 lacked a
Case 22-1426, Document 87, 07/27/2023, 3548202, Page2 of 35
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .00. ec ceececeeseeeenseeecnsaaeeeesaeeecnsaaeeneaeeeesseeeens ill
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT UN REPLY c
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page88 of 93
75
flown to New York on Epstein’s private jet, corroborat-
ing her testimony on that point. (See Br.79 (citing GX-
662-R at 44)). The sam
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page83 of 93
70
B. Applicable Law
“A constructive amendment occurs when the
charge upon which the defendant is tried differs sig-
nificantly from the
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page84 of 93
71
alleged in the indictment.” United States v. Banki, 685
F.3d 99, 119 (2d Cir. 2012). Reversal due to a variance
is appropriate only wh
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page79 of 93
66
not constitute “extraneous” information. Warger v.
Shauers, 574 U.S. 40, 51-52 (2014) (rejecting party’s
attempt to use the “extraneou
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page/1 of 93
58
absolutely necessary to determine the facts with preci-
sion.” Janniello, 866 F.2d at 544. “[T]he proper func-
tioning of the jury sys
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page54 of 93
41
remained subject to indictment in 2007,
once the changes were made. A dead
charge was not resurrected, and the un-
derlying nature of
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page53 of 93
40
“does not prevent the State from extending time limits
for... prosecutions not yet time barred”). As this Court
explained long ago, wh
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page45 of 93
32
continuing offenses that continued into 2004, thus
post-dating Section 3283’s amendment. Moreover, un-
der the Landgraf framework, the
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page39 of 93
26
approval of each affected U.S. Attorney’s Office before
entering into any non-prosecution agreement that pur-
ports to bind another di
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page41 of 93
28
identifies no evidence that the Department of Justice
made any promises not contained in the NPA.” (A.142-
43). Here, as below, Maxwel
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page36 of 93
23
Florida, such as the USAO-SDFL’s “contact with wit-
nesses in New York.” (Br.38). These disparate and un-
connected events do not show
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page38 of 93
25
99 6e
substantive criminal law,” “[p]rocedures in criminal
cases are always those of the forum.”).5
In any event, Eleventh Circuit l
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page34 of 93
21
the prosecution of co-conspirators without clearly say-
ing so.” (A.142).2
Maxwell also points to the NPA provision stating
that “Eps
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page32 of 93
19
by officials of the USAO-SDFL and by no other compo-
nents of the Department of Justice. Accordingly, the
plain terms of the NPA make
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page30 of 93
17
Court should affirm the denial of Maxwell’s motions to
dismiss.
1. Maxwell Is Not Entitled to Enforce the NPA
As an initial matter,
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page29 of 93
16
F.2d 670, 672 (2d Cir. 1985); accord, e.g., United States
v. Prisco, 391 F. App’x 920, 921 (2d Cir. 2010); United
States v. Salameh, 1
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page28 of 93
15
that it will not institute any criminal charges against
any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but
not limited to” four n
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page26 of 93
13
On June 29, 2022, Judge Nathan sentenced Max-
well to 60 months’ imprisonment on Count Three, 120
months’ imprisonment on Count Four,
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page14 of 93
Gnited States Court of Appeals
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Docket No. 22-1426
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
—_—V.—
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Paged of 93
lv
PAGE
POINT IV—The District Court’s Response to a Jury
Note Did Not Constructively Amend the
Indictment .............02.2002 0 eee eee
Case 22-1426, Document 79, 06/29/2023, 3536060, Page2 of 93
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Preliminary Statement ...................004. 1
Statement of Facts............ 0000s 2
A. The Government’s Case....
20
a1
22
23
24
25
Case 22-1426, Document ON AIG 3536039, Page162 of 217
Me6eSQmaxl
cite some cases for that proposition.
United States v. Streb, 36 F.4th 782.
Wa
Th
47
tkins 667 F.3d at 2
20
a1
22
23
24
25
Case 22-1426, Document Oo N_ANG 3536039, Page152 of 217
Me6eSQmaxl
United States v.
sentence than the application of the guidelines in pl
the def
Gu
last date of
becam
Case 22-1426, Document ON 383 3536039, Page129 of 217
14
, defendant objects to the assertion that
Epstein briefly penetrated Carolyn's vagina with his penis
Fense claims is contradicted
overrule
Case 22-1426, Document ON 366 3536039, Page112 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 620 Filed 02/25/22 Page 18 of 21
must be “limited to only what is absolutely necessary to determine the facts wi
Case 22-1426, Document ON 365 3536039, Page111 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 620 Filed 02/25/22 Page 17 of 21
public hearing with input from counsel. The parties may submit questions consis
Case 22-1426, Document EN 359 3536039, Page98 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 620 Filed 02/25/22 Page 4 of 21
sexually abused as a child” as a basis for a broader hearing beyond inquiry into
Case 22-1426, Document “ON 341 3536039, Page87 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 341 of 348
IN RE:
INVESTIGATION OF
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
/
ADDENDUM TO THE NON-PROSECUTI
Case 22-1426, Document SN 339 3536039, Page85 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 339 of 348
EXHIBIT 4
Addendum to the
Non-Prosecution Agreement
DOJ-OGR-00021515
Case 22-1426, Document SN 333 3536039, Page79 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 333 of 348
sentenced not later than October 26, 2007. The United States has no
objectio
Case 22-1426, Document “SN 334 3536039, Page80 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 334 of 348
By signing this agreement, Epstein asserts and certifies that each of these
Case 22-1426, Document EN 339 3536039, Page78 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 332 of 348
proposed agreements with the State Attorney’s Office prior to entering
into
Case 22-1426, Document EN 399 3536039, Page/5 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 329 of 348
IN RE:
INVESTIGATION OF
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
/
NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
IT AP
Case 22-1426, Document EN 395 3536039, Page/1 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 325 of 348
3. Epstein shall waive all challenges to the Information filed by the State
Case 22-1426, Document EN 397 3536039, Page73 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 327 of 348
EXHIBIT 3
September 24, 2007
Non-Prosecution
Agreement
DOJ-OGR-00021503
Case 22-1426, Document “SN 396 3536039, Page/2 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 326 of 348
agreement. Epstein further asserts and certifies that he understands that t
Case 22-1426, Document EN 393 3536039, Page69 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 323 of 348
IN RE:
INVESTIGATION OF
JEFFREY EPSTEIN
NON-PROSECUTION AGREEMENT
IT APPEA
Case 22-1426, Document EN 319 3536039, Page65 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 319 of 348
INDICTMENT
ign
se
ATRUEBILL (6- G45: Gf: ee
uU Ob- FY 4 Bs Eo
IN THE NAME O
Case 22-1426, Document ON 301 3536039, Page67/ of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 321 of 348
EXHIBIT 2
September 6, 2007
Draft Non-Prosecution
Agreement
DOJ-OGR-00021
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A308 3536039, Paged4 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 308 of 348
to be paid to the FBI’s communications to ensure that the victims were rec
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A307 3536039, Paged3 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 307 of 348
Villafafia informed Edwards about the state plea, but did not mention the
Case 22-1426, Document SN 306 3536039, PageS2 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 306 of 348
intentionally concealing information from them and was part of a series of i
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A302, 3536039, Page48 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 302 of 348
not plead guilty in October 2007 as the USAO expected, it was a “very ope
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A304 3536039, Page50 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 304 of 348
previously noted, there is some contemporaneous evidence supporting her as
Case 22-1426, Document EN 300 3536039, Page46 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 300 of 348
agent and Villafafia consulted with the USAO’s Professional Responsibility O
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A397 3536039, Page43 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 297 of 348
investigation. Because the state indictment and information appeared to pe
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A394 3536039, Page40 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 294 of 348
particular charges and victims at issue. Once the hearing was scheduled, S
Case 22-1426, Document 78, A399, 3536039, Page38 of 217
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 292 of 348
strongly objected to the government’s plan to notify victims of the state