Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 _ Filed 08/05/25 Page8sof9
government in Jn re Biaggi moved to unseal Biaggi’s grand jury testimony only after
Biaggi petitioned a three-judge panel in the Souther
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 _ Filed 08/05/25 Page /7of9
of time along with the fact that most of the relevant witnesses, including Hiss, had
died. Jd. at 293. The court ultimately ruled that
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 Filed 08/05/25 Page6of9
institution and others, Judge Hellerstein granted a petition to unseal the grand jury
testimony of David Greenglass, Ethel Rosenberg’s brot
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 _ Filed 08/05/25 Page5of9
when Maxwell’s legal and reputational interests are at stake. These factors weigh
heavily in favor of preserving the secrecy of the grand
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 _ Filed 08/05/25 Page4of9
be affected by disclosure are still alive; and (ix) the additional
need for maintaining secrecy in the particular case in
question.
In re
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 803 _ Filed 08/05/25 Page3of9
release of grand jury records is appropriate even outside the boundaries of Rule
6(e)(3). In re Craig, 131 F.3d at 102. Importantly, “the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 800 Filed 08/05/25 Page3of4
Hon. Richard M. Berman, U.S.D.J.
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer, U.S.D.J.
August 4, 2025
Page 3 of 4
necessary redactions) any submissions to th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 800 Filed 08/05/25 Page4of4
Hon. Richard M. Berman, U.S.D.J.
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer, U.S.D.J.
August 4, 2025
Page 4 of 4
affirmed 147 F.2d 336 (Sth Cir. 1945) (“The
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 796 Filed 07/29/25 Page9of10
B. Additional Information
The Court directed the Government to state whether, “before filing the instant motion,
counsel for the Governme
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 796 Filed 07/29/25 Page8of10
Government is providing under seal a list of witnesses whose accounts were conveyed in the grand
jury proceedings and a corresponding list
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 796 Filed 07/29/25 Page 7 of10
6. The Current Status of the Principals of the Grand Jury Proceedings
and that of their Families
The sixth factor considers “the curren
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 796 Filed 07/29/25 Page4of10
Il. Discussion
A. The Jn re Craig Factors
The Court directed the Government to “address[] with specificity the[] [/n re Craig] factors
a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 795 Filed 07/25/25 Page3of4
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNSELORS
1451 ROCKVILLE PIKE, SUITE 250
ROCKVILLE, MD 20852
TELEPHONE: (501) 301-4NSC (4672)
FACSIMILE: (240) 681-218
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 794 _ Filed 07/23/25 Page2of3
Maxwell has not made that showing. She has not shown, or attempted to show, that the
grand jury materials in her case are apt to reveal a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 785 _ Filed 07/18/25 Page3of4
4. “Tt is a tradition of law that proceedings before a grand jury shall generally remain
secret.” In re Biaggi, 478 F.2d 489 (2d Cir. 197
=
No
Go
wd
on
OY
~]
(ee)
Ke)
a
©
ha
=
No
(ee)
=
ws
On
a
OY
a
~]
a
co
a
Ke)
20
21
22
ae
24
ae
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 38o0f158 38
LBAGma x2 Rocc
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ail eb 3 2702/24 ag Pagef26 of 26
1. The District Court did not err in holding that Epstein’s NPA
with USAO-SDFL did not bar Maxwell’s prosecution by USAO-
S
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 3 2702/24 ag Pagef2ZD of 26
“materially different” from the allegations in the Indictment. The
evidence indicated that Maxwell transported Jane to New
CaseGa20-2200830-PAEI mdb dwahént1781212 0 Ail eb 32702) 2Aag Payef2H of 26
a violation of New York law.”* It is therefore not “uncertain whether
[Maxwell] was convicted of conduct that was the subje
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 3 2702/24 ag Paigef 2H of 26
likelihood that the defendant may have been convicted of an offense
other than that charged in the indictment.”*° A constr
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 3. 2702/24 ag Pagel 2G of 26
Maxwell subsequently filed a letter seeking reconsideration of the
District Court’s response, claiming that this response
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 32/02/24 ag Pagel Hof 26
enough; the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying
Maxwell’s motion for a new trial.*4
4. The District Court
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 32702) 24ag Pagel L6of 26
Indictment. The District Court therefore correctly denied Maxwell’s
motion without an evidentiary hearing.
2. The Indictment
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEI mdb duhént1781212 0 Ai eb 3.2702) 24ag Pagel WG of 26
contemplates a broader restriction.”" And while Maxwell contends
that we cannot apply Annabi to an agreement negotiated and
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEIm doduhent1781212 0 Fil ab 32 702/24 agPageD of 26
District Court imposed a $750,000 fine and a $300 mandatory special
assessment. This appeal followed.
II. DISCUSSION
1. The N
CaseQa26-2200830-PAEIm doduhent1781212 0 Fil ab 32 702/24 ag age of 26
Statutes § 796.07,7 and to one count of solicitation of minors to engage
in prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes § 796
CaseQa20-2200830-PAEIm doduhent1781212 0 Filab 32 702/24 agRage2 of 26
Indictment. Lastly, we hold that Maxwell’s sentence is procedurally
reasonable.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the District Court’s Ju
CaseQa26-2200830-PAEIm dodument1781212 0 Fila 32 702/24 agPage of 26
of three years, three years, and five years, respectively. The District
Court also imposed a fine of $250,000 on each count for a
CaseQa26-2200830-PAEIm doduhent1781212 0 Fil ab 32 702/24 agPage of 26
Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell appeals her June 29, 2022,
judgment of conviction in the United States District Court for the
Southe
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
M6éSOmaxl
ukie
som
United States v.
Circuit case
a minor c
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 37 of101 37
M6SQmaxl
United St
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
NO
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
M6SQmaxl
that
for now.
Paragraph 72,
because her
by a 2009 deposition
Again,
to this at trial.
Paragraph 74,
Document
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 _ Filed 08/10/22 Page 201 of 257 3035
LCKVMAX8 Charge
1 that the intended acts were nonconsensual solely because of the
2 victim's age, you must find that Ms. Maxwe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767
Filed 08/10/22
Page 190 of 257
3024
LCKVMAX8 Charge
1 any feelings you might have about the nature of the crimes
2 charged to interfere with your decision-mak
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCTIAMAX2ps
that we intended to
Document 765 ‘Filed 08/10/22
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 765
Filed 08/10/22 Page 75 of 95 2813
LCIAMAX2ps
1 So that's the proposal. And when would you like to
2 put ina letter?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Depends on what time we fi
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCT1MAX1
one moment.
Document 765
Filed 08/10/22
Page
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCT1MAX1
Document 765 _— Filed 08/10/22 Page 22 of 95 2760
au
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCHVMAX6
Document 763
MR. ROHRBACH:
government, your
H
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 149 of 197 2690
LCHCmax5
MS. M
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCHVMAX4
Document 763 ‘Filed 08/10/22 Page 145 of 197 2686
wi
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330
LCHVMAX4
-PAE
Document 763
trial subpoena weeks ago.
Filed
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCHVMAX4
Document 763 =F
iled 08/10/22 Page 144 of 197 2685
I
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 143 of 197 2684
LCHVMAX4
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
he
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 66 of 197 2607
LCHVMAX2 Young
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 53 of 197
LCHVMAX2
MS. M
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCHVMAX2
you're going
step --
TH
|
pretrial. So,
COU
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
Ww
a
OY
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCHVMAX2
precluded.
THE COURT: 've
Document 763
Filed 08/10/22
Page 43 of 197
2584
relitigated so man
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LCFCmaxl
Document 763
Filed 08/10/22
Page 18 of 197 2559
1 Five full days, including three business days. They had extra
2 days' notice that we were going to rest on Friday
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 763
Filed 08/10/22
Page 16 of 197
2557
LCFCmax1l
1 testimony, we can consider that. We don't have to delay trial.
2 But think this witness has relevant testimony.