Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 46 of 239
respects from those underlying contract law, the district court concluded that “third-party
beneficiaries have no contractual right
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 45 of 239
limitations. As the defendant’s motion recognizes, the Second Circuit has emphasized that plea
agreements differ from commercial co
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 43 of 239
offenses enumerated in the NPA.’ While these same limitations are not repeated in the provision
that purports to immunize “co-consp
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 44 of 239
Government’s promises in the plea agreement to only cover past crimes, observing that “not
limiting the prohibition to past crimes
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 41 of 239
including any agreement not to prosecute, which purports to bind
any other district(s) or division without the express written app
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 40 of 239
OPR Report at 95. The OPR Report further notes that, thereafter, Epstein sought to avoid
complying with the NPA entirely, and his a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 35 of 239
prosecution . . . will be instituted in this District”). In other words, the NPA was expressly limited
to the USAO-SDFL.? Given thi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 34 of 239
not parties to the agreement. This position is at odds with the law in this Circuit, which presumes
a narrow reading of the boundar
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 33 of 239
district in which the dismissed charges are initially brought.
However, the law has evolved to the contrary. A plea agreement
bin
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 32 of 239
1. The Text of the Agreement Does Not Contain a Promise to Bind Other
Districts
Turning first to the text of the NPA, the terms of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 31 of 239
offer any evidence to support her claim that the NPA applies to this District, to the defendant, or
to the crimes in the Indictment
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 30 of 239
illegal sex acts, and aiding and abetting the same, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2423 and 2. Counts
Five and Six charge the defenda
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 28 of 239
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ARR RE RR RRs Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i S1 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GH
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 8 of 239
Hemphill v. United States,
BOD FO 4S: (Sth, Cie, 19GB) cscsmassemsvss sccensomnsusrews asttenwn ianite shseReOnSENESNE LAEREORTAAUR
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 239
VI. Counts Five and Six Are Properly Joined and Should Not Be Severed.................000+ 138
As APPTCEBIS LAW ese accommcnme aun A
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 239
c. Chief Judge McMahon’s Memorandum and Ordet .............:esceeeeeeeeesneeeeeeeeneeeseeeenees 71
7. Nasistraie Indes Neth 'S OFle?
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 239
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ............ccsssssssscssscsssscccsccsccsssssssccesscssscssssssssesecssessoessessssssssssee
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 203 Filed 04/16/21 Page1of2
[uspe SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. DOG Ht
DATE FILED: 4/16/21
United St
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 202 Filed 04/15/21 Page 1 of 8
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA
212-243-1100 © Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 ® Cell New York, New York 10011
888-
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 199
Page 8
Filed 04/09/21
Page 8 of 8
it.” Jd. (internal quotation marks omitted). Accordingly, in this Circuit, District Courts regularly
accept the Government’s
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document199 _ Filed 04/09/21 Page7of8
Page 7
the now-apparent weakness of its case.”’”)). Taken together, these factors all point to the conclusion
that the defendant now face
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document199_ Filed 04/09/21 Page6éof8
Page 6
committed to taking to aid the defense in preparing for trial, the Government anticipates objecting
to any request to adjourn tria
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document199_ Filed 04/09/21 Page4of8
Page 4
Second, the Government does not expect the S2 Indictment to have a significant effect on
the overall length of the trial, because t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document199 _ Filed 04/09/21 Page2of8
Page 2
or about 2007 during the Florida Investigation, as the defendant will be able to confirm for herself
upon receipt of Jencks Act ma
__ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document199 Filed 04/09/21 Page1of8
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
N
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document198 Filed 04/08/21 Pagelof1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eC
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/8/21
United States of America,
_y_
20-CR-3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195_ Filed 04/05/21 Page10of11
Page 10
unnecessary delay and disruption that will occur if the Government only learns of the existence of
such material during trial—th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195- Filed 04/05/21 Page11of11
Page 11
IV. Conclusion
The Government respectfully requests that the Court order the defendant to provide notice
to the Government of p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page9of11
Page 9
II. Any Records Obtained Pursuant to a Rule 17(c) Subpoena Should Be Marked
Confidential Under the Protective Order and Produced t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 _ Filed 04/05/21 Page7of11
Page 7
party can demonstrate” a basis (emphasis omitted)); United States v. Weisman, 01 Cr. 529 (BSJ),
2002 WL 1467845, at *1 (S.D.N.Y.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 _ Filed 04/05/21 Page8of1i1
Page 8
Moreover, as the information currently available to the Government about the BSF
subpoena makes plain, the Government’s concerns
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page6of11
Page 6
2 Accordingly, the
case or motivation to move to quash an otherwise improper subpoena.
Government respectfully requests notice of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page5of1i1
Page 5
Cr. 746 (PKC), 2017 WL 6887596, at *2-*3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2017) (“Preventing the undue
harassment of a cooperating witness is a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page3of11
Page 3
of due diligence; (3) that the party cannot properly prepare for trial
without such production and inspection in advance of trial
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page4of11
Page 4
evidence; it cannot be used as a device to gain understanding or explanation.” United States v.
Rich, No. 83 Cr. 579 (SWK), 1984 WL
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 _ Filed 04/05/21 Page2of11
Page 2
Those obligations, and not Rule 17 subpoenas, provide the avenue through which
defendants in criminal cases obtain discovery. As
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document195 Filed 04/05/21 Page1ofi1
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document194 Filed 04/05/21 Page1of2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c
Laura A. Menninger
HAD DON 150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628
www
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document193 Filed 04/02/21 Pagelof1
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK aged
DATE FILED: 4/2/21
United State
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 192 Filed 03/31/21 Page 1 of 3
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA
212-243-1100 © Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 ® Cell New York, New York 10011
888-
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page/7of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 7 of 7
Material,” which is clearly sought for impeachment purposes, is not a proper sub
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page6éof7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 6 of 7
they have not demonstrated the relevance of all of the evidence they seek.”). Th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page5of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 5 of 7
than impeachment, many of them are procurable from the Government and are thus im
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page4of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 4 of 7
because “the subpoena was not crafted to call for admissible evidence. Rather, it
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page3of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 3 of 7
party cannot properly prepare for trial without such production and inspection in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page2of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
March 22, 2021
Page 2 of 7
Government prior to the arrest was somehow improper and that her accusers, severa
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document191 Filed 03/30/21 Page1of7
BOIES
SCHILLER
a LEXNER
Sigrid S. McCawley
Telephone: (954) 377-4223
Email: [email protected]
March 22, 2021
VIA EMAIL (FILED UNDER SEA
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document189 Filed 03/29/21 Pagelof2
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK poc#s
DATE FILED: 3/29/21 sf]
United St
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document188 _ Filed 03/29/21 Page5of5
Page 5
no impact on several of the defendant’s motions, such as the motions to suppress (Motion 3 and
Motion 11), the motion to dismiss t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document188 _ Filed 03/29/21 Page1lof5
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
Ne