Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 22 of 22
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that on January 25, 2021, I served by email, pursuant Rule 2(B) of the
Court’s individual pra
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 22
Here, the government did not even attempt the Martindell process the Attorney General
attempted in Palnicr’. as
a
III. The governmen
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 18 of 22
indicted, and she didn’t know for a month more just 3 7777 7
a
Martindell has been binding Second Circuit law for more than forty yea
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 17 of 22
Id. at 294. Either avenue, explained the Court, would provide the real party in interest notice of
the government’s request and an opp
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 16 of 22
decision in Martindell v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. and violated Maxwell’s
rights.
In Martindell, the government trie
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 15 of 22
Amendment rights); see also People v. Gutierrez, 222 P.3d 925, 936 (Colo. 2009) (concluding
that a taxpayer has a reasonable expectati
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 13 of 22
Maxwell did not voluntarily share anything with JJ and because every other circumstance
supported Maxwell’s expectation that her i wou
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 12 of 22
including Maxwell’s i, and not to share Confidential information with law
Motion under the Due Process Clause to Suppress and Dismiss
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 22
degree to which the subpoena would reach private material of no pertinence to the grand jury’s
inquiry.” See In re Grand Jury Subpoena
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 9 of 22
See Motion under the Due Process Clause to Suppress and Dismiss Counts 5 and 6, Ex. D, at 17
(emphasis added). The government’s represe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 8 of 22
GE «Was in fact a Fourth Amendment search. And even if the government’s conduct did not
amount to a search, it constituted a seizure, w
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 7 of 22
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206, 2213 (2018) (holding that an “official intrusion into
[the] private sphere generally quali
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 3 of 22
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
Boyd v United States, 116 U.S. 616 (1886) oo... eceecesecnseeseesseeseesseesaecaeceesaeesaeeseesaeenaes 3,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 22
F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), which required the government to give Maxwell notice and an
opportunity to be heard on its request. And in byp
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 5 of 22
Ghislaine Maxwell moves under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell v. Int’! Tel. & Tel.
Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), and the Fifth A
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......... ce eeeeeccecssssececeenseceecnssneececnssaeeececnssaseesessssescecnssasescvessasesseenaa
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 140 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 22
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 139 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, NOTICE OF
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 14 of 14
VI. ORGANIZATION OF THE REPORT
The Report is divided into three chapters. In Chapter One, OPR describes the relevant
federal, state
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 14
investigate, litigate, or provide legal advice.? OPR also has jurisdiction to investigate allegations
of misconduct against Departm
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 9 of 14
carefully considered the comments and made changes, or noted comments, as OPR deemed
appropriate; OPR did not, however, alter its fin
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 7 of 14
Secretary of Labor. In a brief oral statement, Acosta explained that continued media attention on
his handling of the Epstein investi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 14
abuse of minors. The Miami Herald report led to public outrage and media scrutiny of the
government’s actions.*
On February 21, 2019
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138-4 Filed 02/04/21 Page 4 of 14
NPA required Epstein to plead guilty in state court to the then-pending state indictment against
him and to an additional criminal in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 21 of 26
plaintiff, Virginia Giuffre. During the course of that litigation, in 2016, Ms. Giuffre’s lawyers
made overtures to the government see
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 16 of 26
was never considered a suspect. Ex. B at 10-11, 177, 180-82, 187-96, 241-42, 278. None of Mr.
Epstein’s alleged victims said they had
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 15 of 26
any other known witness. Mr. Casey would be able to testify about Accuser-1’s behavior during
the relevant time period, the lack of an
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 11 of 26
consequences.’” United States v. Sabath, 990 F. Supp. 1007, 1018 (N.D. Ill. 1998) (quoting,
BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 1270 (6th ed.1990))
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 26
consider the reasons for the delay as well as the prejudice to the accused.” United States v.
Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 790 (1977); Unite
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 9 of 26
charges alleged in Counts One through Four, 18 U.S.C. § 3283, which as amended in 2006,
authorizes the prosecution of certain specific
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 8 of 26
resolved the allegations against himself and any potential co-conspirator. Faced with significant
public pressure, the government broke
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 26
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Ms. Maxwell brings this motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(b)(3)(A)(ii) which requires
that motions to dismiss an
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 138 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 137 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, NOTICE OF
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
fe
ws
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
28
24
25
Idas@sT2O-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 18 of 33 17
addresses but,
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
fe
ws
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
28
24
25
Idas@sT2O-cr-00330-AJN Document 136-9 Filed 02/04/21 Page 14 of 33 13
just talked ab
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 136 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 135 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
TICE OF MOTI
GHISLAINE MAXW
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 23 of 23
Certificate of Service
Thereby certify that on January 25, 2021, served by email, pursuant Rule 2(B) of the
Court’s individual practi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 21 of 23
B. At A Minimum, This Court Should Order A Hearing At Which Maxwell
May Inquire Into The Circumstances Surrounding The Government’s
M
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 19 of 23
ee
SC
Had known the truth, Jj likely would not have granted the government’s
application to modify the Protective Order to allow J to
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 17 of 23
expressly invoked the assurances of the Protective Order. So did the district court in permitting
these intrusions and ordering Maxwel
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 18 of 23
had in the Chemical Bank case. In no uncertain terms, J explained why she had
haled the prosecutor back into court:
Ex. E, p 2.
In
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 14 of 23
At that time, however, the government did not act. Boies “was particularly frustrated by
the failure to pursue a perjury charge [again
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 12 of 23
ht;
government claimed, indicated that the [as
ES Now her did the government
acknowledge that MJ had in fact approached the prosecuto
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 11 of 23
C. The Settlement And Boies Schiller’s Refusal To Comply With The
Protective Order
In 2017, the parties settled the defamation claim,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 10 of 23
The district court granted the motion. In requiring Maxwell to answer highly intrusive
questions “relating to [her] own sexual activit
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 6 of 23
Ghislaine Maxwell moves to suppress all evidence the government obtained from a grand
jury subpoena it issued to I and to dismiss Count
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defend
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 133 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, NOTICE OF