Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 5 Filed 07/05/20 Page 2 of 2
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
July 5, 2020
Page 2
also intends to use the time until any initial appearance be
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 9 of 10
The defendant’s international connections and significant financial means would present a
clear risk of flight under normal circumstances,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 7 of 10
date of the amendment,' to permit a prosecution at any point during the lifetime of the minor
victim. See United States v. Chief, 438 F.3d
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 6of 10
acts are so serious that both crimes carry a statutory presumption that no condition or combination
of conditions will reasonably assure th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 5of10
18 U.S.C. § 3142(g). Evidentiary rules do not apply at detention hearings, and the Government is
entitled to present evidence by way of prof
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 4of10
the defendant would encourage victims to accept Epstein’s offers of financial assistance, including
offers to pay for travel or educational
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 3of 10
BACKGROUND
On June 29, 2020, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a
sealed indictment (the “Indictment”) cha
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR Em Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXW
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 2 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Unsealing Order
—~y.— : 20 Cr. 330
GHISLAINE MAXWE
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 16 of 18
om List all the people under the age
interacted with at any of Jeffrey’
of 18 that you
Ss properties?
A. I’m not aware of anybody tha
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 15 of 18
aided and abetted the same, to wit, MAXWELL arranged for Minor
Victim-1 to be transported from Florida to New York, New York on
andl etr
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 18 of 18
Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed. 9-25-58)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
YW
GHISLAINE MA
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 12 of 18
13. From at least in or about 1994, up to and
including in or about 1997, in the Southern District of New York
and elsewhere, serrata M
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 14 of 18
New York Residence, in violation of New York Penal Law, Section
1304.55.
ec. In or about 1996, when Minor Victim-2 was
under the age of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 11 of 18
a. Between in or about 1994 and in or about
1997, when Minor Victim-1 was under the age of 18, MAXWELL
participated in multiple group se
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1 Filed 06/29/20 Page 1of18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
seheaweeeeasedwueuea #
¢ SEALED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : INDICTMENT
= Vi # 20
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page2 of 24
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
2. Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed on June 29, 2020,
charging Maxwell in six counts. On July 2, 2020, Maxwell w
Casmat204c7-003B0AUNeNDo Cutt h® 202 1 FACAMeBE5Ragerdge 30Of 8
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA
212-243-1100 * Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 * Cell New York, New York 10011
888
Case 21-770, Document 57, 04/19/2021, 3080288, Paged of 30
contrary. Not a single on of the anonymous accusers saw or heard what
purportedly happened to the other accusers. Not a single one of the
an
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Paged of 25
allegations in the Indictment are supported by the detailed, credible testimony of
three different victim-witnesses. (See, e.g., Ex. A at
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page2 of 25
District Court for the Southern District of New York, by the Honorable Alison J.
Nathan, United States District Judge.
3. Indictment 20 C
Caseel217 /ot00 2extauMent Dodd BAG62 Filst66206/Phg Paye A 66D6
In this Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court explains its release analysis under the
Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142. It also exp
Cased 20-CrO0360uATNt DibCumentl 1682 1FikeG OSA2/2agPlages o642
Court’s view has not changed. The Court again concludes that the Government has shown by a
preponderance of the evidence that the Defe
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNt DibCutrentl1702 1Fikeb OSB /2agPlagecds O618
Conceded Problems Undermine the Strength of the Government’s Case
As Ms. Maxwell’s period of detention passes the nine-month mark,
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNt DibCutent1702 1FikeGb OSM /2agPlageds O618
prosecution.
The ongoing review of discovery confirms the lack of evidence in support of the
stale allegations in the indictment. Fur
Cased 20-C€rO03304AGNit DioCu trent 1602 1F ited 2226/2 4g Faget 71 Ob 9
accounts and will be entrusted with the authority to oversee the assets of Ms. Maxwell and her
spouse, as described above.
Re
Cased 20-€rO03304AGNt DieCu trent 1602 1F ied 2226 /24g Pagel J Ob 9
INTRODUCTION
Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Memorandum in Support of her Third
Motion for Release on Bail.
As Ms. M
CaGade2bter TD IZ0cdOhen (Dite Gineh101 O20 2h || @@ 6.2730) 26a Geaigeot A Ob 22
successfully to resist extradition to the United States in relation to the charges in the superseding
indictment date
Casest:20-c1/00BR@AUNt B6Etine rf 1/26 2 FileehR230/RagPaget71G522
detention without bail is warranted under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(1). The Court accordingly denies
Defendant’s request to reopen the ori
Casest:20-c1/00BR@AUNt D6Etiner# 1/26 2 FileenR230/RagPageh G22
combination of conditions can ensure her appearance. This is so because: the charges, which
carry a presumption of detention, are serio
CaSese 20 6f AMD SB0s Aste nie nH 10321 , ARaBI2Y S72QeRage Of 4
IN THE MATTER OF AN OPINION
ON THE EXTRADITION LAW OF ENGLAND AND WALES
RE GHISLAINE MAXWELL
ADDENDUM OPINION
1. | This Addendum Op
Cases: 20-cr/0088G1AUNt BOEwMErt 1082 Filedeh2/23/RagPageB1Gh15
as a substitute for its prosecution of Epstein.? The government’s case is not what it represented
to the Court at the initial bail hear
Cases: 20-cr/0088 GAN BOEwuMErt 1082 FiledeR2/23/RagPaget71Gh15
here. Whether or not the accusers’ recollections as to Epstein are corroborated is irrelevant to
the strength of the evidence against M
CaGede20t er OD FZ0cAGNe n DibGMeH01 G0) 2Ailed G2AL8/ 26a aged? 4 Ob 36
the media even when a bounty was offered for her location and when numerous media outlets were
searching for her.
The charts,
CaGede20t er OD FZ0cAdNtn DibGmehO01 G00 2A iled G2AL8/2BacRagect F Ob 36
the jurisdiction of her choosing (i.e., the one to which she chose to flee). The Department of
Justice’s Office of Internatio
CaGede20t er OD FZ0cAaNt n DibGmeh01 G20 2A iled G2AL8/26aRadgeot 1 Gb 36
reconsideration” by, for example, demonstrating “that the court overlooked information or
incorrectly applied the law,” or th
CaGede20t er OD IZ0cAINen Ditcimeh01 000 2Filed 42408) 26a deagef 4 Ob 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
wn eee eee nee x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Cased 20-€F O03GOuAUNt Deuter $70 2F il GO 42504 26a dedga 36 2045
In addition, the discovery appears to show that, i
7 the government did not issue subpoenas for documents related to Ms. Maxwell un
Cased 20-C/Qd3GO4AUNNt Dib2yiPE/tl G70 2Ftil SO A2ABM/ 26a GeagGd 35 2PA5
Mr. Julie opines that the French entity with jurisdiction over the legality of extradition
requests would not oppose Ms. Maxw
Cased 20-€FOd3GOuAUNt Deum G70 2F il GO A2s0M 26agedgeé Lf 20a5
a who are already suffering without her presence, and she would cause financial
ruin to herself and her closest family and friends.
i
Cased 20-C/Qd3GO4AUNt Dib2 Pet G70 2Ftil SO A2ABM/ 26a deage D4 20A5
(Nathan, J.) (reconsidering bail decision based, in part, on evidence suggesting government’s
case weaker than alleged at initial
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
fan)
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page148 of 200 85
k7e2MaxC kjc
sig
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
Ww
a
OY
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page145 of 200
k7e2MaxC kjc
quoting there
Cir. 2019).
The court concludes as
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
fan)
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page134 of 200 71
k7e2MaxC kjc
TH
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
fan)
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page127 of 200
k7e2MaxC kjc
We be
be
NO
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page89 of 200
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
Ww
a
OY
20
21
22
23
24
25
k7e2MaxC kjc
arrest of Mr. Epstein.
information as to her where
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke}
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page83 of 200 20
k7e2MaxC kjc
t
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page79 of 200 16
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 include electronic materials, to be due by Monday, November 9
2 of this year, and following that we would propose th
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page/5 of 200
k7e2MaxC kjc
12
1 and federal law disclosure obligations.
2 Go ahead, Ms. Moe.
3 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
4 With respect to
Casest:20-cr/00 BBG UAUAnt BON rt L20FilesOGRISI2P ahage c10261019
spent the last two decades without facing consequences for her criminal actions. For years before
her arrest in this case, the defen