Browse by Document Type
Other (98,409 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 381 Filed 10/29/21 Page5of5
Tracking Number: EJ699436427US
Scheduled Delivery by Status
THURSDAY Available for Pickup
October 28, 2021 at 10:59 am
by
OCTOBER BROOKL
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 381 Filed 10/29/21 Page2of5
now a month away from trial and any delay receiving her legal mail impedes her ability to adequately
prepare for trial.
Further, Ms. Maxwel
Tracking Number: EJ699436400US
Scheduled Delivery by Status
SATURDAY Available for Pickup
October 19, 2021 at 6:51 am
by
z | 6 pray ER 6:00pmo BROOKLYN, NY 11232
Get Updates \v
Fo eeeer—CCis
Avai
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 381 Filed 10/29/21 Page3of5
EXHIBIT A
DOJ-OGR-00005453
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 52 of 54
XI. The Defendant Should Be Precluded from Arguing That She Was A “Prevailing
Party” in Civil Litigation
The Court should preclude
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380-1 Filed 10/29/21 Page1of3
Exhibit A
DOJ-OGR-00005448
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 49 of 54
power to misapply the law. Such verdicts are lawless, a denial of due process and constitute an
exercise of erroneously seized power
cl)
on
eel
re}
1)
[
sy
(i)
vi
<
Cc
om |
cl)
fay
DOJ-OGR-00005444
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 48 of 54
IX. The Court Should Preclude Evidence or Argument Sounding in Nullification
The defendant may attempt to offer evidence of aspects
LO
on
eel
re}
1)
[
sy
{_}
vi
<
Cc
om |
cl)
fay
DOJ-OGR-00005443
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 47 of 54
United States v. Castro, 813 F.2d 571, 575-76 (2d Cir. 1987)). But this doctrine “has never
required the admission of portions of a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 46 of 54
automatically admit his alternative explanation for his flight, insofar as he wishes to bring in his
out-of-court statements to othe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 43 of 54
404(b)(1) is designed to prohibit.” United States v. Dawkins, 999 F.3d 767, 792 (2d Cir. 2021)
(upholding exclusion of “testimony re
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 42 of 54
on the victims for participating in the defendant’s crimes, embarrassing the victims and inviting
the jury to engage in stereotyping
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 38 of 54
the Federal Rules of Evidence contain extensive provisions governing the impeachment of
witnesses. Fed. R. Evid. 607-13. Rule 806 al
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 39 of 54
Minor Victim-6, including statements made by them, that testimony will not include any
statements by Minor Victim-5 or Minor Victim-
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 32 of 54
Cir. 2017) (summary order) (instructing jury that the “government is not on trial” is
“appropriate” (internal quotation marks omitte
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 31 of 54
(2d Cir. 2006) (summary order) (affirming a district court that sustained an objection during a
defense summation). Accordingly, iss
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 30 of 54
hearsay. See id. at 246 (majority op.) (charging decisions proper subjects for cross-examination
only “if otherwise admissible”); Hi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 29 of 54
Dep’t of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility Report, Dkt. No 293 Ex. A). Discussion
of those issues would be all the more
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 27 of 54
automobile is deemed to be the possession of all passengers in the automobile unless the firearm
is found on the person of a particu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 24 of 54
undue confusion and an unnecessary sideshow . . .”); United States v. Boyle, No. 08 Cr. 523
(CM), 2009 WL 5178525, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. D
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 20 of 54
Similarly, the Sixth Circuit has found that a district court properly admitted evidence of prior
consistent statements that “rebutte
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page19 of 54
rules allowing admission of prior consistent statements outside of the context of Rule
801(d)(1)(B) in order to rehabilitate a witnes
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page18 of 54
protecting victim identities outweighs the public interest in access to information because “the
public and press will be able to hea
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page16 of 54
Public disclosure of victim information is unnecessary. The defendant already knows the
true identity of all six Minor Victims, Witne
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page 15 of 54
their testimony. Publicizing their names will subject them to unwanted attention at the time they
are testifying in a criminal sex a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page14 of 54
stigma. These details are “inflammatory” in light of the “nature of the conduct alleged.” Order
at 32, United States v. Raniere (May
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page12 of 54
The Government also requests that two witnesses (“Witness-1” and “Witness-2”), who
the Government expects will testify at trial about
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 Filed 10/29/21 Page9of54
the media” and “loss of employment potentially resulting from trial publicity.” Marcus, 2007
WL 330388, at *1. These interests significant
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 _ Filed 10/29/21 Page10of54
names were already public and that some victims had come forward by choice, Judge Garaufis
found those facts “irrelevant”: “just becaus
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 Filed 10/29/21 Page11of54
B. Discussion
The victims are expected to testify in explicit detail and/or be the subject of highly
sensitive and personal testimony co
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 Filed 10/29/21 Page /7 of 54
“TT here is no absolute right of an accused to have a jury hear a witness’s true name and
address.” Clark v. Ricketts, 958 F.2d 851, 8
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 380 Filed 10/29/21 Page6of54
order) (alterations in original) (quoting Delaware v. Van Arsdall, 475 U.S. 673, 679 (1986)); see
Fed. R. Evid. 611(b) (imposing limits on
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document379 Filed 10/28/21 Page2of2
the entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4
degrees will be allowed to enter the courthou
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document378 Filed 10/27/21 Page2of2
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Laura A. Menninger
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
150 East 10th Avenue
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 375 Filed 10/27/21 Pagelof2
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\
212-243-1100 * Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715
917-912-9698 * Cell New York, NY 10007
888-587-4737 ° Fax b
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document376 Filed 10/27/21 Page2of2
Dated: October 27, 2021 Mi \) kf
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
DOJ-OGR-00005388
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 373 Filed 10/26/21 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\
212-243-1100 * Main 225 Broadway, Suite 715
917-912-9698 * Cell New York, NY 10007
888-587-4737 ° Fa
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document375 Filed 10/27/21 Page2of2
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\
more focused on unfounded inconvenience to its witnesses above prudence in seating a jury that
can be fai
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document372 Filed 10/26/21 Page2of3
Page 2
v. Kaloyeros, et al., 16 Cr. 776 (VEC); United States v. Percoco, et al., 16 Cr. 776 (VEC); cf. Oct.
12, 2021 Tr. at 7:14-8:1, Unite
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 373 Filed 10/26/21 Page 2 of 2
DOJ-OGR-00005384
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 367-1 Filed 10/22/21 Page 16 of 17
(i) the same employment information with respect to the juror’s significant other
and any working children or member of the juror’s
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 367-1 Filed 10/22/21
67. [Per the suggestion of the court of appeals in United States v. Ganias, 755 F.3d 125,
132-33 (2d Cir. 2014), vacated on other grounds, 824 F.3
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 368 Filed 10/25/21 Page2of2
Dated: October 25, 2021 AN \) ik
New York, New York
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States District Judge
DOJ-OGR-00005376
(Z10Z ANAS) Sth pc ddng J 198 ‘spsasnng
‘A SOIDIS pallu) eas acep Ainf oj onp peuinyisao
se“ ANCS Ul sey pres [eroueury jseSuo] Jo oulo Ut yOIpIOA
df} ‘WolIppe Uy “seTq ISAOOUN Jo/pue ssoupNyyNy UIT
“S[ENPIAIpUT SUTATHSO} UTeIEO Jo coulasqe
ol) Wo poseg JUOUTUISAOD ol) IsuTeSe sooussoyUT Averp oy Ain
ot) MOTT? p[nom yey) (WoTON.ASUI ssoujLM SuIssTUL e se Yons)
Spunois ore or1o]) ‘oydurexo Jo.J “
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 367-1
54. [have tried to direct your attention in these questions and through the questionnaire
you filled out to possible reasons why you might not be able to sit as
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 367-1 Filed 10/22/21
what the law is or what you think it should be. At the conclusion of the case, your job will be to
determine whether or not the defendant is guilt
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 367-1 Filed 10/22/21
there anything about that experience that would prevent you from acting as a fair and impartial
juror in this case?
38. Has any juror, or any of