Browse by Document Type
Other (98,409 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 14 of 16
Again, the government states that the report inculpates Ms. Maxwell. (Opp. 186-87). But even
the unredacted portions of the report rev
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page13 of 16
obligation to obtain the documents because they are in the custody of a third party. (Opp. 185-
88). The government’s arguments are una
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 12 of 16
Finally, the government’s offer to provide Jencks Act and Giglio information for its
testifying witnesses “as much as four weeks” befo
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 10 of 16
showing of need, and that comparable and customary disclosure deadlines for these materials are
appropriate. (Opp. 184-85, 188-93). Bu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page5of16
her of the crimes charged in the Indictment. A bill of particulars is therefore necessary to
prevent unfair surprise at trial and to allow
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
United States v. Bortnovsky,
820 F.2d 572 (2d Cir, 1987)... cee ecceceecceseeeeeeeeeseeneeeecseeeeeaeeeeeeeneeneeneese
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 287 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. The Court Should Grant a Bill of Particulars.............cccccccccceccesecesceceseeeneceseenseenseeeesseeneee
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page12o0f14
Til. At Minimum, the Government Must Demonstrate the Admissibility of Evidence
Regarding Accuser-3 Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).
Th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page13o0f14
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Ms. Maxwell respectfully requests that the Court strike all
references to Accuser-3 from Paragraph
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page9of14
government’s allegations regarding Accuser-3 are thus not in furtherance of, and are irrelevant
to, any alleged conspiracy to cause minor
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page8of14
The government also improperly stretches the scope of the alleged conspiracies in a
failing attempt to make its allegations regarding Accu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page6of14
The government does not and cannot dispute that Accuser-3 was above the legal age of
consent in England at all relevant times, and that it
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page5of14
Even more incomprehensible is the government’s argument that the allegations regarding
Accuser-3 are not prejudicial. The government conce
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page3of14
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Page(s)
Cases
Esquivel-Quintana v. Sessions,
137 S.Ct. 1562 (2017) ooo ccc cccccccseeceeeseceseeesseecaseesseeaeee
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 286 Filed 05/20/21 Page2of14
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. The Allegations Regarding Accuser-3 Are Irrelevant to the Alleged Conspiracies. .......... 2
Il. The Allegati
Casask AiG -ONSIAPARW SDP ayeIMneRehSS FilkeCceMePS! Pdgeceila ah12
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that on June 6, 2016, I electronically served this Defendant's Response in Opposition to
Motion t
Casask 30i1g-ONesaPARwsPaoueMneasPss Fibecherdemls! pdgage & fi12
Putting aside the admissibility of this testimony, it appears that both men were involved in the
investigation of Mr. Epstein and are
Casask 01g -ONeIAaPARWSPapHHIeNeAePss Aibecherdehls1 Pdgeas & afi12
The Federal Rules presumptively limit the number of depositions that each side
may conduct to ten. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2) (A) (“
Casask 41g-ONesaPARWsPaueIMneAePss Fiibecherdemls1 Pdgage df afi12
Plaintiff makes a bizarre argument that somehow this testimony can be used to create an
adverse inference against Ms. Maxwell . des
Casask 1g-ONesaPARWsPaoweiMneashss Aibecherdenls1 Pdgaae ok afi12
and (c) facts demonstrating that the burden and expense of the discovery is justified by the needs
of this case. Indeed, she has not
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 2
Log Privilege Doc
ID Email Sent Date Email From Email To CC Address Subject Matter Type of Privilege |Action Page Count | Type
Plaint
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-8 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1 of 12
EXHIBIT Q
DOJ-OGR-00004202
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-6 Filed 05/20/21 Page3of3
Phone Numbers
Mobile:
Other:
Email Addresses
Email:
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_02742754
DOJ-OGR-00004199
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-7 Filed 05/20/21 Page 1of2
EXHIBIT P
DOJ-OGR-00004200
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-6 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of3
EXHIBIT O
DOJ-OGR-00004197
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-5 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of4
EXHIBIT N
DOJ-OGR-00004193
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-4 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of3
EXHIBIT M
DOJ-OGR-00004190
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page 6of7
e AK did not express any concerns about anything to the attorneys. AK may have asked
something like whether the attorneys are asking SDN
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page7 of 7
When the Topic of Epstein Came Back up with the Miami Herald Article
e Arose when AK was in Securities. AK was no longer the Human Tra
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-3 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of3
EXHIBIT L
DOJ-OGR-00004187
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page4of7
e AK’s recollection is that the attorneys did not make any suggestions regarding what
investigative steps SDNY should take. The attorneys
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page5of7
Sean to call AK back and let her know if the Florida agents had concerns. Sean never
called AK back. AK doesn’t recall ever affirmatively
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page3of7
e LP directed AK to “they will send me affidavits and depositions” on page 8 of AK’s
notes and asked if AK recalls what that line refers
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2of7
February 11, 2021 Call with Amanda Kramer
Present on Conference Call:
AUSAs Lara Pomerantz & Maurene Comey
FBI Special Agent Amanda Y
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21
Class Action
Personal Injury
Wrongful Death
Whistleblower Cases
STAN POTTINGER
J. STANLEY POTTINGER PLLC
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 10 of 10
i
Brad
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-2 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of7
EXHIBIT K
DOJ-OGR-00004180
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 9of10
—— a LZ Tage
Vayu ie. outauled Ese
= a + hantuatlt_aste_wf naw ol
* wetter by Mpe used
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_02742885
DOJ-OGR-00004178
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 8of 10
OOM a's, she below mal mes Sua C2P
i a mA Suan of LUA.
ten
ae. Wie selles ile
es
ci letag a ae asl Caches —
:
|
ge»
i sani abe pd
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 7 of 10
O
eS al Fah Cig Ep Alutes1acholeal
Ms, ch. Chrewh. Ee psteca hoped. off. Hl Coils
liga , tanga oll aver OF Fast. Sha Leber
cael h
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 6of10
~ BOID _- tn os oft Epler L Abo _
| fo loll bin Darn lowell Phew block eal.
| Pus fp ClnP = apy blows Adal b/c
Io cays Sell K-Y?o
rr o
—@
=~@& Abel ie [Abe ad
ta Thre Heeldesl _ a
git fae welt
IF Bd Guat bWwIS§ME A. Sone -
I-
|
= "EL suck Moa enone ocd cad Ue puns ies oa —
| 1 LSA bfe thus Ld ol b- caberco
ag ic el & pr ae
=1
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page 2 of 10
I we —_ RVE-re a (Abas Bovey _ local Bile
“Ola
ee wad my Bye tlel_g
Sets [nati e ep ne Lionas Miol Serres
PD fpwacal ges Es ie Mu
- V2/mnel Suma Pv C22ge,
to Awa [7
~ tin WF fy fran lay Meare EE asters - baw bs
NL
N
- na Cin bay, adh vecads Grr hor aa hit plone
= Sins. quas & _prviake (lewd. Lite G. Tames ~Usv]
~ Faw mies s
~ US A4byney hay _said_Cala\ be postcutaat ef |
ADS beet Cw] corodires Ep (ie waa
pes She. una. _SDK oc ISO am (& |
lJ
Ghislaine, Woe wedl — ashe ob (Clhet- Movipelt—
Ki a
CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_02
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 32 of 34
The government of course does not suggest that any of its agents, such as AUSA
HEE. Would be willing to provide an affidavit to Maxwel
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 33 of 34
Respectfully submitted,
s/ Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
Laura A. Menninger
HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN P.C.
150 East 10th
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285-1 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of10
EXHIBIT J
DOJ-OGR-00004170
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 29 of 34
conviction.’” United States v. Bout, 731 F.3d 233, 238 (2d Cir. 2013) (quoting United States v.
Schmidt, 105 F.3d 82, 91 (2d Cir. 1997
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 30 of 34
In turn, this already high standard ratchets up even higher when a prosecutor appears
before the court ex parte. “The duty of candor i
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 26 of 34
reports were replete with misrepresentations and outright lies about the conversations he had
with, and information provided by, a con