Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page/5 of 91
p.m., the parties may inform the Court in writing of any errors that were the result of
the Court's inputting the changes from todays cha
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page/4 of 91
many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the
witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b)
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page73 of 91
(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/12/2021)
12/12/2021 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C.
Sternhei
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page/2 of 91
12/09/2021)
12/09/2021 | 533 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene
Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, a
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page/1 of 91
12/05/2021 | 525 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S.
Pagliuca dated December 5, 2021 re: Re
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page/0 of 91
11/30/2021 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S.
Pagliuca dated November 30, 2021 re: Pseudonym
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page64 of 91
11/19/2021
475 | JOINT LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
Christian R. Everdell dated 11/19/21 re: Vid
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page62 of 91
for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40
Foley Square, New York, New York. In accordance with its p
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page61 of 91
that covers the person's nose and mouth. Bandannas, gaiters, and masks with valves
are not permitted. If a person does not have an approv
to seal portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access. ENDORSEMENT:
The Court received the attached letters via email. This District no longer permits
public access by telephone for in—
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page58 of 91
and audio feeds of the proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the
proceeding in the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited.
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page59 of 91
November 12, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on
11/11/2021) (Inl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
436 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page5/ of 91
see Dkt. No. 412, as well as the Court's communication with the United States Marshal
for the Southern District of New York. The Governme
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page56 of 91
ORDERED to file a supplemental letter responsive to the Court's question on or before
12:00 p.m. on November 7, 2021. For the sake of cla
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page55 of 91
11/03/2021 | 413 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Defendant's motions
for reconsideration. See Dkt. Nos. 4
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page54 of 91
(Entered: 11/02/2021)
11/02/2021 | 405 | JOINT LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J.
Nathan from AUSAs Alis
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page53 of 91
10/29/2021 | 402 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of Defendant's letter
regarding delivery of Defendant's legal m
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page52 of 91
10/29/2021 | 392 | MOTION in Limine fo Suppress Identification. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell.
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pagliuc
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page50 of 91
dire. In light of the District's COVID—19 protocols, the Court has proposed an
additional question on page 6 of the questionnaire, which
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page51 of 91
Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/27/21)Gw) (Entered: 10/27/2021)
7 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Je
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page48 of 91
attorneys are fully able to prepare for trial. This resolves Dkt. No. 346. SO Ordered..
(Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 10/15/21)(jm
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page47 of 91
Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated October 11, 2021 re: Sealing of Joint.
(Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 10/13/2021)
3 | ORDER as to Ghi
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page38 of 91
05/07/2021 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R.
Everdell dated May 7, 2021 re: Cover Letter
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page33 of 91
ENDORSEMENT: Because remote access is available for tomorrow and because no
electronic devices may be used in the courtroom or overflow r
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page32 of 91
the grounds that it was returned by a grand jury sitting at the White Plains courthouse
(Dkt. No. 125) is DENIED as moot. SO ORDERED. (Si
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page23 of 91
02/04/2021 | 146 | MEMORANDUM in Support by Ghislaine Maxwell re 145 MOTION to Strike
Surplusage from Superseding Indictment.. (Cohen, Mar
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page21 of 91
this Order. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 1/25/2021) (ap) (Entered:
01/25/2021)
118 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Ju
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page19 of 91
materials under seal and proposed narrowly tailored redactions on those materials. The
Government did not file any opposition to the Defe
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page18 of 91
against the presumption of access. Id. at 11920. "Such countervailing factors include
but are not limited to the danger of impairing law
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page17 of 91
12/07/2020 ENDORSED LETTER as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan
from Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell dated
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page16 of 91
12/03/2020
12/03/2020
12/03/2020
12/04/2020
12/04/2020
12/04/2020
12/07/2020
12/07/2020
instead proposing redactions to both the
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page15 of 91
11/18/2020 | 73 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 60 Letter filed by USA as
to Ghislaine Maxwell re: The Government respe
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page14 of 91
10/07/2020 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 60 Accordingly, the
Government respectfully requests that the Court approve th
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page13 of 91
08/25/2020 | 49 |MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: denying without prejudice 38 LETTER
MOTION as to Ghislaine Maxwell (1). On August 10, 2020
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page10 of 91
8/21/2020., Motions due by 12/21/2020) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on
7/15/20)Gw) (Entered: 07/15/2020)
07/21/2020 | 26 | ORDER as
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Paged of 91
Highest Offense Level
(Terminated)
Felony
Complaints Disposition
None
Interested Party
Reporters Committee for Freedom of represented
Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page2 of 91
CLOSED,APPEAL,ECF
U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cr-—00330-AJN All Defe
4/4(21r ST
¢ 505.00
ZZ5O
CaGede222ct AB IDoAUN eiDocamen06g70 2Piled OF40 7/2
Criminal Notice of Appeal - Form A
NOTICE OF APPEAL
United States District Court a
Caption: a eS So
ption: oe ee.
Uni
M f N [)/ \T E 3115458, Page’ of 1
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for
Case 21-58, Document 96, 06/02/2021, 3112207, Page1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page24 of 24
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(g), the undersigned counsel
hereby certifies that this opposit
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page21 of 24
into Maxwell’s unit.t Maxwell tries to point to the case of Tiffany Days as
corroboration of supposed sewage flooding, but she critically om
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page20 of 24
Maxwell did not couch her most recent request to the District Court as an application
for pretrial release; instead, she sought an order dir
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page23 of 24
CONCLUSION
39. For the foregoing reasons, Maxwell’s motion should be denied.
Dated: New York, New York
May 27, 2021
/s/ Maurene Comey
Ma
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page19 of 24
nighttime checks involve shining a flashlight directly into her eyes (as opposed to
the ceiling), that the checks in fact disturb her sleep,
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page18 of 24
34. Consistent with her practice throughout the pendency of this
case, Judge Nathan carefully considered Maxwell’s most recent complaint tha
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page16 of 24
the context of post-conviction bail proceedings, “given the findings that must be
made in order to warrant release, it is generally more app
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page15 of 24
abuse of discretion or clear error. See United States v. McCloud, 837 F. App’x 852,
853 n.3 (2d Cir. 2021).
B. Discussion
28. This Court ha
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page13 of 24
“renewed motion for pretrial relief,” is both procedurally improper and substantively
meritless. It should be denied.
A. Applicable Law
23.
Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page9 of 24
monitored Maxwell’s conditions of confinement, including by ordering the
Government to submit regular updates regarding that topic (see Gov’t