Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
CaSest: 20-80 0880HAEN Ie uUMént/LOP 1 FAeadsas2272Ag ePage1Gh12
provided in denying bail, proposing two additional conditions to the ones she proposed in her
second motion for bail. Specifically, sh
Casest: 20-80 0880HAEN ID uUMéht/LOP 1 FAeadsas2272Ag ePageB1Gh12
escape; and that the Defendant’s lack of candor regarding her family ties and financial situations
raised serious doubts as to her wi
CaSest: 20-80 0880HAEN Ae uUMénht/LOP 1 FAleadsas2272Ag ePageil1Gh12
Usbe SDNY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED
poc#
DATE FILED: 3/22/21
Uni
CaSest: 20-80 0880HAEN Beh uMént/LV? 1 Fiedsos2372g ePagek#1Gh18
instead guided by concerns of efficiency. Here, it is unclear whether interlocutory appeal of a
district court’s decision regarding ba
CaSest: 20-80 0880HAEN AebuMEnt/LV? 1 Fiedsas2372g ePagel16h18
Preliminary Statement
The issue before the Court, as it has been since Ms. Maxwell’s first bail application,
is whether conditions exis
CaSest: 20-80 0880HAEN Deb uMént/LV? 1 Filedsas2372g ePageotl1Gh18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
meen enn enn nn ee enema x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
20 Cr. 330 (AJN
Cased 20-08; COSBOnAEIN 3DScOMEent4G51 , BiIlEGHBINOG/age Plagef I ob 9
Page 9
determination that the Government’s case is strong.
IV. Conclusion
The defendant continues to represent a “plain[]” ris
Cased 20-08; COGB0nraIN 3SHScOMEent4G5! , BiIlEGH3ING/age Rage 6 ob 9
Page 6
her intent not to flee. (Dec. Op. at 13 n.2). The Court recognized that “a defendant could
strategically offer to waive t
Cased 20-08; COSGOnAEIN 3DScOMEent4G51 , BIlEGH3ING/ age Ragef 71 ob 9
Page 7
would be forced to wait years for the defendant’s return.
As the Government has repeatedly emphasized, the strong possi
Cased 20-08; CO3G0nraIN 3HScOMEent4G5! , BiIlEGH3ING/age Raigef 3 ob 9
Page 3
defendant cannot simultaneously pursue bail in both the Second Circuit and the district court. To
allow her to seek reli
Cased 20-08; COSG0nraIN 3SHScOMEent4G5! , BIlEGH3INOG/age Ragef A ob 9
Page 2
bail in July 2020, the defendant filed a renewed motion for release in December 2020 in which the
defendant proposed a “
Cased 20-08 C0360r7eIN 3SD6cOrHenv14G5i , BIEGH3709724e Ragef 1 Gb 9
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s P
Casest:20-cS00880HAdNt AeeuPeht /LO@ 1 Fleckaa2sFagePage Boat 9
assure her appearance as required. Before preventive detention may be ordered under § 3142(e),
the Court is obliged to determine both w
Cased 20-08, COGBOsAGIN SDScOhEriv4GO1 , BilEdH202 Hage PRagef gd ob 9
affirm Ms. Maxwell’s earnestness in seeking bail to properly prepare her defense, not to flee.
The Court should grant bail to G
Casesb:20-cS00880HAdNt Ade uPieht ‘LOA 1 Fleckaa2sFaAgeP age Goat 9
of Ms. Maxwell’s London house and any other assets, excluding salary, hereinafter acquired.
The asset manager will approve the fina
Casesb:20-cS00880HAdNt AeeuPhéht ‘LOA 1 Fileckaa2sFagePageé Sat 9
earnestness to abide by the conditions of her release and underscores that she has no intention to
flee and reflects her deep need to
CaSest:20-c800880HAEN Add uMéht /LO@ 1 FieadsaA2sFAg ePAageE 16a 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
V.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defen
Caseabe? @-cS60BRGUURnt Dbciindé rf 1/26 2 FileebR230/RagPagekboaf 22
hearing to evaluate Maxwell’s motion, and it declines to do so. See United States v. Raniere, No.
18-CR-2041 (NGG) (VMS), 2018 WL
Caseabe? @-cS60BRGUURnt Dbctindé rf 1/26 2 FileebR230/Rag Paget Sof 22
does not mean that those people would be unable to visit her were she to flee to another country.
In addition, the Defendant con
Caseabe? @-cS60BRGUURnt Dbciindér# 1/26 2 FileebR230/RagPagetlise 22
COVID-19 related travel restrictions. Jd. at 83:21 83:25. The Court also observed that the
Defendant had family and personal conne
CaGade2lepQd3GOsAuNht Bioute/ntl 102 1F iOG3 2200 /2eg Pagel d 6 22
abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O’Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That
burden is “limited.” United States v. Me
CaGade2DlepQd3GOsAUNt Bi Ouite/tl 102 1F POG32200/2egraygef 4 ob 22
defendant presents a danger to the community,’ and ‘by the lesser standard of a preponderance of
the evidence that the defendant pr
PANG!
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 12/28/20
CaSade2Z0tepQ)C36CuAuNit Bsutetl 1062 1F iG S2280/20g¢4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United
CaGede20t eb)CO3604ARNt Dit Cutrentl 102 1Fikeb 42228 /209 Paget 1 Ob 15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
een nn nn wn on nn nn oo nn nn nn oo nn nnn eee ee = == xX
UNITED
Casmat204c680B30:ANbnt Bec mem W020, FIGASH1 Bags 3Bagel Bf 2
SCHILLER
— FLEXNER
Sigrid S. McCawley
Telephone: (954) 377-4223
Email: [email protected]
December 15, 2020
The Honorable Alison J. N
Cageabi20-cre608aGAunnt Becumént 1002 Filed6R238/2thg Page BOs 36
In urging a different conclusion, the defense again cites the same cases discussed in its
initial briefing and at the July 14, 2020 h
Cageab20-cre608aGAunnt Becumeért 1002 Filed6R238/2thg Page tl Bos 36
demonstrated ability to live in hiding—numerous courts have recognized that purported waivers
of extradition are unenforceable and
Cageab20-ce60BaGAunnt Becumént 1002 Filed6R238/2thg Page O6sf 36
to other countries outside of the European Union, including the United States. As set forth in
Exhibit B, according to the MOJ, the Fr
Cageab20-ce608aGAunnt Becumént 1002 Filed6R238/2thg Page tl Lost 36
defendant faces up to 35 years of incarceration, and may very well spend the remainder of her
natural life in prison. The seriousne
Cageab2 0-ce60BatAGAnt B6cumMert 1002 Filed6R238/2tagPagé Lost 36
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR Em Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE
CéBast:20-S8O0ORBDHAGNt FOCCUMANt O02 FilsObBHIA/ Pageage cH261045
appeared in the High Court, House of Lords and Supreme Court in leading extradition cases; and
has acted as an expert consultant to
Cadest:20-O8008Q0HAENt ASSL UMENT/AN2 FileebhAIA/ Pag Page 2B26145
2. Ms. Maxwell’s Counsel Was in Regular Contact with the Government
Prior to Her Arrest
At no time, however, did Ms. Maxwell intend
Cadast:20-O8008G0HAEN ISACUMENt/ON2 Filed6BaIA/PagPage e2261045
trust for the benefit of Ms. Maxwell, from 2015-2020. The Macalvins report and a :
report are attached as Exhibits O and P.*
As set fo
Cased 20-D8-C0GGOEIN 3SHAcOHOnt2AV2 1FiROG32214 Bag PFlageor 2605
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Memorandum in Support of her Renewed
Motion for Release on Bail.
Cased 20-28, COGGO7EIN 3SBAcOHOnt 272 1F ROG 3224 Bag Flagecs 2605
Exhibit A.
Exhibit B.
Exhibit C.
Exhibit D.
Exhibit E.
Exhibit F.
Exhibit G.
Exhibit H.
Exhibit I.
Exhibit J.
Exhibit K.
Exhibit L
Cased 20-08; CO0GGOEIN 3SHAcOHOnt2AV2 1FiROG32214 Bag Flageol 2605
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
© eee SEE SEE SEES SEES SEES SEE SEES OES SEES SEE SEES OEE See >.4
UNI
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
fan)
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page64 of 200 il
k7e2MaxC kjc
UNITE
CaSeast:20-O8008Q0HAENt ISCUMMEt /222 Fileensh3G/ Pag PageB2on19
domestically and abroad; (3) her finances are completely opaque, as her memorandum pointedly
declines to provide the Court with inform
Cadeasb:20-O8008Q0HAENt ISCUPMEht /222 FileensA3G/PagPageZ2o019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
I x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~V.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Def
CaSast:20-O8008Q0HAENt ASCUMMEht /222 FileensA3G/PagPagetl2pn19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
I x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~V.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Def
Case Ie2hlcrQdSSOUAUIN DotemleHh4 FPitdd B77 FOL PAGES St 20
cases related to Epstein in the Southern District of New York and has sat for depositions in
those cases. Similarly, throughout the course
CAs@F:26-CRODSSOAIN B8ctunert 13 FieeOPA O20 Paged of 260
innocence.”’). The government has failed to meet its burden of establishing that Ms. Maxwell
presents an “actual risk of flight” and must be
CAs F:26-CRODSSOASN B8ctunerh 13 HieHOPAD/20 Payee of 260
purpose of protecting herself and those close to her from the crush of media and online attention
and its very real harms—those close to her
CAs@F:26-CRODSSOASN Boctunerh 13 FieeOPAD/20 Page? of 260
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ee x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
v.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
Cadest:20-O8008G0HAENt AdouMEht /20 FilecOGAH202 P ahagefi26i010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
I x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
~V.- : 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
De
Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page1 of 200
No. 21-770 & 21-58
In the
Auited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWE
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page24 of 31
This is why defendants charged under the same statute in the
Southern District of New York are regularly granted bond. United
States v. Hu
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page12 of 31
The court said it was detaining Ms. Maxwell, in part, because the
government proffered that its “witness testimony will be corroborated
by
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page? of 31
FACTS
Ghislaine Maxwell is a 59-year-old, law-abiding United States
citizen with no criminal history. In July 2020, she was living peacefu
Case 21-58, Document 39-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page4 of 31
These conditions would support a complaint for cruel and unusual
punishment for a convicted felon. Ms. Maxwell is not one. She is
innocent