Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page19 of 20
12/30/2020
motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential
information that should not be filed on the pub
Case 21-58, Document 6, 01/12/2021, 3011775, Page’ of 1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL
Short Title: United States v. Maxwell Docket No.: 21-58
Substitute, Additio
Case 21-58, Document 8, 01/12/2021, 3012026, Page’ of 1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL
Short Title: United States v. Maxwell Docket No.: 21-58
Substitute, Additio
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page17 of 20
necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to
her legal materials and her ability to communicate wit
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page16 of 20
12/04/2020 | 85 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R.
Everdell dated December 4, 2020 re: Bri
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page14 of 20
11/06/2020 | 69 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page15 of 20
temporarily sealed while the Court resolves the redaction request. SO ORDERED.
(Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/1/2020)(bw) (Entered
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page12 of 20
parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the
parties shall provide support and argument for wh
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page10 of 20
(Entered: 07/27/2020)
07/27/2020 32 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 31 LETTER by USA as to
Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Ju
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page5 of 20
Highest Offense Level
(Terminated)
None
Complaints Disposition
None
Plaintiff
USA represented by Alex Rossmiller
U.S. Attorney's Offic
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page3 of 20
ECF,INTAPP
U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN All Defendants
Ca
Case 21-58, Document 3-2, 01/12/2021, 3011691, Page1 of 20
CAO2db Intake
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 8:38 AM
To: NYSD CourtMail
Subject: Activity in Case
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page17/ of 19
those materials. The Defendant did not file any opposition to the Government's
proposed redactions. The Court will adopt the Government's
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page18 of 19
12/30/2020
motion. In light of the fact that the Opinion includes potentially confidential
information that should not be filed on the pub
Case T2& é40633D-cclmeDocuite h2 LOL 1 Fued 1he48Ragchayee1 o
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED; 12/28/20
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Unite
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page16 of 19
necessary steps to ensure that the Defendant continues to receive adequate access to
her legal materials and her ability to communicate wit
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page15 of 19
12/04/2020 | 85 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Christian R.
Everdell dated December 4, 2020 re: Bri
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page14 of 19
temporarily sealed while the Court resolves the redaction request. SO ORDERED.
(Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/1/2020)(bw) (Entered
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page13 of 19
11/06/2020 | 69 | LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from
AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page11 of 19
parties shall propose redactions to the letter briefing on this issue. Alternatively, the
parties shall provide support and argument for wh
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page9 of 19
(Entered: 07/27/2020)
07/27/2020 32 | MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 31 LETTER by USA as to
Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Jud
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page4 of 19
Highest Offense Level
(Terminated)
None
Complaints Disposition
None
Plaintiff
USA represented by Alex Rossmiller
U.S. Attorney's Offic
Case 21-58, Document 1-2, 01/12/2021, 3011673, Page2 of 19
ECF,INTAPP
U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN All Defendants
Ca
Cas@ ds202 dra s30caditn Deeumene1a@ 1Fiked O6/ PLM ageeae Rot 1
DOCUMENT
Criminal Notice of Appeal - Form A ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED-January 11, 2021
United States D
Case 20-3061, Document 109, 11/09/2020, 2970926, Page3 of 4
unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” United States v. Punn, 737 F.3d 1, 5 (2d Cir. 2013)
(internal quotation marks omitted).
Th
Case 20-3061, Document 109, 11/09/2020, 2970926, Page2 of 4
Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (Alison J. Nathan, Judge).
UPON DUE CONSIDE
Case 20-3061, Document 109, 11/09/2020, 2970926, Page4 of 4
appeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell
“provide[s] no coherent explanation” connecting
Case 20-3061, Document 105, 10/19/2020, 2955220, Page3 of 4
unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” United States v. Punn, 737 F.3d 1, 5 (2d Cir. 2013)
(internal quotation marks omitted).
Th
Case 20-3061, Document 105, 10/19/2020, 2955220, Page2 of 4
Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (Alison J. Nathan, Judge).
UPON DUE CONSIDE
Case 20-3061, Document 105, 10/19/2020, 2955220, Page’ of 4
20-3061
Umited States v. Marcwell
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
SUMMARY ORDER
Rulings by summary order do not ha
Case 20-3061, Document 105, 10/19/2020, 2955220, Page4 of 4
appeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell
“provide[s] no coherent explanation” connecting
Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page3 of 4
unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.” United States v. Punn, 737 F.3d 1, 5 (2d Cir. 2013)
(internal quotation marks omitted).
Case 20-3061, Document 104-2, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page of 1
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVI
Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page2 of 4
Appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York (Alison J. Nathan, Judge).
UPON DUE CONSI
Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page4 of 4
appeal concerns an unsealing order. Further, as the District Court correctly noted, Maxwell
“provide[s] no coherent explanation” connecti
Case 20-3061, Document 104-1, 10/19/2020, 2955206, Page‘ of 4
20-3061
Umited States v. Marcwell
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
SUMMARY ORDER
Rulings by summary order do not
Case 20-3061, Document 96, 10/08/2020, 2948491, Page‘ of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))
TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS
Case 20-3061, Document 99, 10/09/2020, 2948846, Page‘ of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held a
Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page1 of 5
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-85
Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Paged of 5
Certificate of Compliance
Under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(g) and Rule 27(d)(2)(A), the
undersigned counsel hereby certifies th
Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page2 of 5
20-3061
United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
—against —
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Case 20-3061, Document 95, 10/08/2020, 2948488, Page3 of 5
addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms.
Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals.
The u
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page21 of 23
though, is obvious: The government wants to shield itself from Ms. Maxwell’s
forthcoming motion before Judge Nathan challenging its circum
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page11 of 23
ES And Ms. Maxwell’s
deposition testimony in the civil case provides the substantive basis for two of the
six charges she faces. App. 27-
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page10 of 23
Court reviewing Judge Preska’s decision deserve to know nov (iii
, a post-trial appeal is insufficient.
This Court, therefore, has juris
Case 20-3061, Document 83, 10/02/2020, 2944305, Page of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT (Local Rule 34.1(a))
TO REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT, FILL OUT THIS
Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page of 23
20-3061
United States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee,
— against —
GHISLAINE MAXWEL
Case 20-3061, Document 91, 10/07/2020, 2947381, Page‘ of 1
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
DEBRA ANN LIVING
Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page37 of 37
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure
32(g), the undersigned counsel hereby certifies that
this brief
Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page35 of 37
29
she can appeal to this Court following the entry of final
judgment in the criminal case.
Maxwell presented Judge Nathan with no coher