Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 6 Filed 07/06/20 Page 32 of 33
MIME-Version:1.0
From:ecf [email protected] .gov
To:[email protected]
Bee:
--Case Participants: John S. Davis (caseview.ecf@usd
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 6 Filed 07/06/20 Page 31 of 33
MIME-Version:1.0
From:ecf [email protected] .gov
To:[email protected]
Bee:
--Case Participants: John S. Davis (caseview.ecf@usd
Caésasé@:2(2@rr09GG032IN) Damumenie AFielO/Gk2 Reagpe20q@fB3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
United States Case No. 20-mj-132-01-AJ
V.
Ghislaine Maxwell Charging District Ca
Casesé:2(@2Orr0eGG032IN0 Damtument@ AietO/GR2 Regpe22 atB3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
United States of America
Vv. Case No. 20-mj-132-AJ-1
Ghislaine Maxwell
Pub
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 6 Filed 07/06/20 Page 2 of 33
Complaints Disposition
None
Plaintiff
USA represented by John S. Davis
US Attorney's Office (NH)
James C Cleveland Federal Bldg
53 Pl
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document4 Filed 07/02/20 Page 1of10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
AR RE RR Em Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
-V.- i 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWEL
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 2 Filed 07/02/20 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
— — —
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
—
ORDER
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 13 of 18
wit, transportation of minors, in violation of Title 18, United
States Code, Section 2423 (a).
16. It was a part and object of the cons
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document1_ Filed 06/29/20 Page 10 of 18
abuse of minor victims by Jeffrey Epstein, including some of the
specific events and acts of abuse detailed above.
| STATUTORY ALLEGATIO
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the
Thu
Case 21-770, Document 77, 06/02/2021, 3112207, Page‘ of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page24 of 24
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(g), the undersigned counsel
hereby certifies that this opposi
Dated:
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page23 of 24
39.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Maxwell’s motion should be denied.
New York, New York
May 27, 2021
/s/ Maurene Comey
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page19 of 24
nighttime checks involve shining a flashlight directly into her eyes (as opposed to
the ceiling), that the checks in fact disturb her sleep
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page21 of 24
into Maxwell’s unit.t Maxwell tries to point to the case of Tiffany Days as
corroboration of supposed sewage flooding, but she critically o
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page20 of 24
Maxwell did not couch her most recent request to the District Court as an application
for pretrial release; instead, she sought an order di
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page18 of 24
34. Consistent with her practice throughout the pendency of this
case, Judge Nathan carefully considered Maxwell’s most recent complaint th
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page16 of 24
the context of post-conviction bail proceedings, “given the findings that must be
made in order to warrant release, it is generally more ap
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page15 of 24
abuse of discretion or clear error. See United States v. McCloud, 837 F. App’x 852,
853 n.3 (2d Cir. 2021).
B. Discussion
28. This Court h
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page13 of 24
“renewed motion for pretrial relief,” is both procedurally improper and substantively
meritless. It should be denied.
A. Applicable Law
23
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page9 of 24
monitored Maxwell’s conditions of confinement, including by ordering the
Government to submit regular updates regarding that topic (see Gov’
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page3 of 24
Maxwell bail. (Ex. D). Maxwell twice renewed her bail application (Ex. E, I), which
motions Judge Nathan denied in written orders dated Dece
Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page1 of 24
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dkt. Nos. 21-58, 21-770
Appellee,
: AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITI
CaSest:20-cr/00Bat AGN B6cumMent 2222 FileqOs/H7/PagPage fof 3
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA
212-243-1100 © Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 ® Cell New York, New York 10011
88
Casest:20-cr/00Bat AGA B6ermMent 2202 Filedoos/95/PagPage2asf 2
Page 2
because MDC has identified a number of factors that raise heightened safety and security concerns
with respect to this defendan
Casesb:20-cr/00BBG1AUNt DOednent 2/202 Filedoo3/05/PrgP age tla 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaz
CaSest:20-cr/008BGAGNt B6eumMeEnt 2262 Filed0Wa/290/PragPage flor 4
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA
212-243-1100 © Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 ® Cell New York, New York 10011
Casesin26-di7- Cob aia Auinel BG MEH 2262 Fi RIBOA/EO/ PMagPhge B20r 4
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of th
Case 21-770, Document 70-2, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page14 of 20
Exhibit D
Doc. 270
Government’s Response to Ghislaine Maxwell’s conditions
at Metropolitan Detention Center
May 5, 2021
DOJ-OGR-000014
CaSede20t er-O0 F30cAdN n DGeamentl 7820 riled OBADA/ 27 adeagef Pot 2
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT nica
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 3/1421 |
U
TSOQAF i RABOANE) Pagel Of 4
CaSeise201 2 Gis s0edditetDGaaneinT
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the Uni
Case 21-770, Document 70-2, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page1 of 20
No. 21-770 & 21-58
In the
Guited States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
V.
GHISLAINE MAXWEL
Case 21-770, Document 70-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page4 of 14
of sleep would alleviate her stress instead of exacerbate it. Ms. Maxwell
replied. Ex. E, Doc. 272.
The district court then issued an ord
Case 21-770, Document 70-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page3 of 14
Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Renewed Motion for Bond
Although this Court denied Ghislaine Maxwell’s motion for bond
(see Ex. A, Order, A
Case 21-770, Document 70-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page’ of 14
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-
Case 21-770, Document 70-1, 05/17/2021, 3102450, Page2 of 14
No. 21-770 & 21-58
In the
Guited States Court of Appeals
for the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
V.
GHISLAINE MAXWEL
Case 21-770, Document 68, 04/27/2021, 3087718, Page‘ of 1
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United Stat
Case 21-770, Document 67, 04/27/2021, 3087715, Page‘ of 1
21-58-cr (L), 21-770-cr
United States v. Maxwell
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated term of the United Stat
Case 21-770, Document 63, 04/27/2021, 3087472, Page‘ of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
Caseat2O4cr-003B0ATKEnDoCuatehB LW? 1 Fea O67 RagePagd 30f 5
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\
up because it is part of her medical record, which is protected by the American Health Insurance
Portab
CaStas201c7-003B0AWNENDoCuade h 202 1 FueaCRBS5RagePageé Bf 8
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIA\
witnesses, including potential FRE 404(b) witnesses, and trial exhibits, the government’s
speculation
Case 21-770, Document 57, 04/19/2021, 3080288, Page10 of 30
paradise,’ not one of the most notorious prisons in America. A “day room.”
Two computers. Recreation. Eye masks. But the Government’s descr
Case 21-770, Document 57, 04/19/2021, 3080288, Page2 of 30
Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her
Motion for Pretrial Release
The Government’s Response underscores why this Court shou
Case 21-770, Document 55, 04/16/2021, 3079459, Page’ of 1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL
Short Title: United States v. Maxwell Docket No.: 21-58(L), 21-770(CON)
S
Case 21-770, Document 57, 04/19/2021, 3080288, Page1 of 30
No. 21-770 & 21-58
In the
Auited States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
V.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Case 21-770, Document 50-2, 04/15/2021, 3078116, Page1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
3 tm i Sm mt mt tt ».4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
No. 21-770/21-58
Appellee,
—i Vv. —i
Case 21-770, Document 50-1, 04/15/2021, 3078116, Page1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-8
Case 21-770, Document 46, 04/13/2021, 3076657, Page‘ of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a Stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at
Casest:20-cr/00BBtAGNt B6eumMeént 296 2 Filed/04/06/Prg Page b2af 6
Page 6
Should the Court have any questions or require any additional details regarding this topic,
the Government will promptly pr
Casesb:20-cr/00BBGHAUNt BOcenént 428 2 Filed/d7/05/PragP age tl2F 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Pl