Browse by Document Type
Court Filings (12,056 documents)
CaSest:20-cr/00BatAUANt BOcemMént 2/28 2 Filed/02/05/PagPage 22af 2
Page 2
before being provided to the inmate recipient. Due to the large number of MDC inmates and the
volume of mail received at th
Casesb:20-cr/00BBGHAU At BOceMsnt 496 2 Filed/O4/0G/PragPagetL2af 6
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Pl
Casesb:20-cr/00BBGHAUNt BOeenént 4/29 2 Filed/a7/04/PragPage tla 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Pla
Casest:20-cr/00BatAGANt BoeumMént 2/29 2 Filed/02/03/PagPage haf 2
Page 2
to the laptop, the Government generally defers to the judgment of the MDC in managing inmates
at its facility, and sees no r
CaSede20t er-O0 F30cAdNn Deeamehil LLB) AAiled 04/04/28 adeagef Pat 2
800 Third Avenue
COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022
— Wt 919.987 FANN nhann
| USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
Christian R. Everdell ELECT
Casest: 20-cr/0088G1AGNnt BOcamMednt B20 FilesOvaO¢hR & aBage tla 2
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Metropolitan Detention Center
80 29h Street Usbc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY
Casest:20-cr/008aGAd Ant Boerumént B20 Filea0V2/08R 0 aPagetaat 2
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 12/8/20 |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Uni
CaSest:20-cr/008B OANA BOeuMésnt 720 Flledoi2/ 0420 aBage fast 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
CaSesb:20-cr/008BQHAU Nt BOcumMént 720 FiledOH PERC aPage fast 2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
Cases: 20-cr/0088G1A0Nnt BOcamMent 720 FilesOr 26h P aBage kaa 2
Page 2
seven days per week. Accordingly, the defendant is receiving the same amount of time to review
her discovery and the same amou
Casest: 20-cr/0088Q1AGNnt BOcamMent 720 FiledOva Oar & aBage Raat 2
Page 2
searching (e.g., weekly body scan, 15-minute interval flashlight checks at night, and open-mouth
inspection) despite being
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page25 of 25
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32(g), the undersigned counsel
hereby certifies that this oppo
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page24 of 25
positioned to note with respect to the principal case cited below. (See Ex. D at 90-
91 (distinguishing United States v. Stephens, 447 F.
Case 21-770, Document 40-1, 04/12/2021, 3075763, Page1 of 25
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Dkt. Nos. 21-58, 21-770
Appellee,
: AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSI
Case 21-770, Document 38, 04/12/2021, 3075291, Page2 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
wee eee eee eee eee ee ee eee eee eee eee Xx
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : AFFIRMATION
A
Case 21-770, Document 38, 04/12/2021, 3075291, Page1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square, New York, NY 10007 Telephone: 212-857
Case 21-770, Document 23, 04/01/2021, 3068597, Page‘ of 1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE FOR SUBSTITUTE, ADDITIONAL, OR AMICUS COUNSEL
Short Title: United States v. Maxwell Docket No.: 21-58(L), 21-770(CON)
S
Case4:27-€YO204eumién thtcinehd300 2 Filed G2106/Atagedge o8 1616
hopes that Mr. Robertson can see them that way.
This is no way to prepare for a trial. The defense team needs to be able to meet wit
Case4:27-€rO204eumién (DhichnehD3O0 2 Filed O2106/Atagedge 4 616
decision. First, the government represents that, per the United States Marshal’s Service, “the
interview room at the courthouse can be
Casee217 /ot00 2etauent Dodd BA62 Filkt66206/Phg Payee & 6HD6
1991) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not recognize a ‘motion to reconsider.’ Instead,
the rules allow a litigant subject to an
Caseel217 fot00 2extauent Body Md BA62 Filst66206/Phg Paye df d6d6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
No. 17-CR-02949-MV-1
Vv.
D
Casee1240/CO00BB0HAEN Ad uMEnt /L5P 1 Faedsoa 672g ePage fl 163
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIAA
212-243-1100 © Main 33 West 19th Street - 4th Floor
917-306-6666 ° Cell New York, New York 10011
88
Case 21-770, Document 20-3, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page149 of 165
Exhibit N
Doe. 306
United States v. Dashawn Robertson,
Case Number 17-cr-02949-MV1, District of New Mexico
Memorandum Opinion and Orde
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNt DioCumentl 1682 1FikeG OSA2/2agPldged’ 612
that the Defendant poses a significant risk of flight. Thus, the Court again concludes that there
are no conditions of release that wi
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNt DibCumentl 1682 1FikeG OSR2/2agPlagec? o642
of the government’s case and warrant granting bail on the conditions proposed.” Def. Mot. at 7.
Those motions became fully briefed on
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNt DibCumentl 1682 1FikeGOSR2/2agPlages 0642
If, as here, there is probable cause to find that the defendant committed an offense
specifically enumerated in § 3142(e)(3), a rebutta
Cased 20-C€rQ0360uAGNt DibCumentl 1682 1FikeG OSA2/2agPlagec? 612
provided in denying bail, proposing two additional conditions to the ones she proposed in her
second motion for bail. Specifically, s
Cased 20-C€rQ03604ATNt DibCumentl 1682 1FikeG OS2/2agPlageds 612
escape; and that the Defendant’s lack of candor regarding her family ties and financial situations
raised serious doubts as to her wil
Cased 20-CFQ0360uATNt DioCumentl 1682 1FikeGOS2/2agPlageol 642
Usbe SDNY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED
poc#
DATE FILED: 3/22/21
United St
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAGNit Dibcutrentl1702 1Fiked 8SieB/2agPldgect O618
instead guided by concerns of efficiency. Here, it is unclear whether interlocutory appeal of a
district court’s decision regarding
Cased 20-CrQ0360uAuNt DibCutrenti1702 1Fikeb OSB /2agPldgedt o618
Preliminary Statement
The issue before the Court, as it has been since Ms. Maxwell’s first bail application,
is whether conditions e
Cased 20-CrO0360uAGNt DibCutenti1702 1FikeGOSe/2agPliddecl o618
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
meen enn enn nn ee enema x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
G
Casee1240/FR00RR0HASN Ads uPAeht /LOZ 1 FileckeasO9F2g ePag eb 1G
Page 9
determination that the Government’s case is strong.
IV. Conclusion
The defendant continues to represent a “plain[]” risk of f
Casee1240/fR00RR0HASN Ads uPAeht /LOZ 1 FIleckasO 972g ePageb 1G
Page 6
her intent not to flee. (Dec. Op. at 13 n.2). The Court recognized that “a defendant could
strategically offer to waive the ri
Casee1240/FO00RR0HASN Ads uPAEht /LOZ 1 FileCkas/O 972g Pag @f7 16Gf9
Page 7
would be forced to wait years for the defendant’s return.
As the Government has repeatedly emphasized, the strong possib
Casee1240/fR00RR0HASN Ads uPAeht /LOZ 1 FileCeasO 972g ePageB1G(
Page 3
defendant cannot simultaneously pursue bail in both the Second Circuit and the district court. To
allow her to seek relief in
Casee1240/HR00RR0HASN Ads uPAeht /LOZ 1 Fileckeas/O9F2g ePage?2 1G
Page 2
bail in July 2020, the defendant filed a renewed motion for release in December 2020 in which the
defendant proposed a “subs
Caseel240/R008B0HAEN 2ADeeuMMént /L6S 1 Filecsas/OoF2AgePag etl 169
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Pl
Cased 20-C€rO03304AGNit DieCu trent 1602 1F ited 2226 /24g ages 8 Ob 9
assure her appearance as required. Before preventive detention may be ordered under § 3142(e),
the Court is obliged to determine
Casee1240/TO00RB0HASN Ads uPAeht /LO 1 FeCl A23721g ePag eb 1G(9
affirm Ms. Maxwell’s earnestness in seeking bail to properly prepare her defense, not to flee.
The Court should grant bail to Ghislai
Cased 20-€FO03304AGNit DioCu trent 1602 1F ited 62226 /249 Paget 6 Ob 9
of Ms. Maxwell’s London house and any other assets, excluding salary, hereinafter acquired.
The asset manager will approve the
Cased 20-C€rOd330uAGNt DieCu trent 1602 1F ied 2226/2 49 age 5 Ob 9
earnestness to abide by the conditions of her release and underscores that she has no intention to
flee and reflects her deep need
Cased 20-C€rO03304ATNit DieCu trent 1602 1F ied 2226 /2ag Pages 1 Ob 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
V.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
D
CaGade2bter WD IZ0cdOhen Dehe Gireh101 O20 2h | @@ 6.2730) 26a Geajeol 3 Ob 22
does not mean that those people would be unable to visit her were she to flee to another country.
In addition, the Defen
Casest:20-c1/00BR@AUNt BGEtine rf 1/26 2 Fileehk230/PagPageb1Gn22
abrogated on other grounds by United States v. O’Brien, 895 F.2d 810 (1st Cir. 1990). That
burden is “limited.” United States v. Merc
Casest:20-c1/00BRG@ AUN B6Etine rf 1/262 FileehRaS0/PagPagek1Gn22
defendant presents a danger to the community,’ and ‘by the lesser standard of a preponderance of
the evidence that the defendant pres
Caésese:20-cr00BaGAUnt Bbc rt 1/26 2 Filee6Ba30/PagPege ; _
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 12/28/20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United
CaSese 20-ef 00 220sAdTe nich ne 10321 , ARAB i2bs72QePage Hof 4
WILLIAM JULIE
AVOCAT A LA COUR
December 18, 2020, Paris.
Response to the government’s memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s re
Cases: 20-cr/0088G+AGNNt BOEwuMErt 108 2 FiledeR2/23/RagPagetl1g615
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
een nn nn wn on nn nn oo nn nn nn oo nn nnn eee ee = == xX
UNITED STATE
CaSese Z0-ef U0 220s Aste nt lhideB neh) 10021 , FIRB 5201 9720 e Ragé 166f 2
SCHILLER
— FLEXNER
Sigrid S. McCawley
Telephone: (954) 377-4223
Email: [email protected]
December 15, 2020
The Honor