Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page12of51
of these provide any likelihood, much less a substantial likelihood, that the jury convicted the
defendant solely because she intended for
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page10of51
The Court’s Mann Act jury instructions also permitted the jury to determine only whether
the defendant had intended that Jane (for the sub
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page6of51
crime, in general terms,” but not “the particulars of how a defendant effected the crime.” Jd. at
*20. The “object of a conspiracy constitu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page7of51
from those alleged in the indictment.” Gross, 2017 WL 4685111, at *31. Reversal due to a
variance 1s appropriate only when the defendant ca
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page5of51
defendant enticed and transported Jane to New York with the intent that Jane engage in illegal
sexual activity, and that the defendant cons
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document621 Filed 02/25/22 Page4of51
33(a).! “The defendant bears the burden of proving that he is entitled to a new trial under Rule
33[.]” United States v. McCourty, 562 F.3d
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620_ Filed 02/25/22 Page18 of 21
must be “limited to only what is absolutely necessary to determine the facts with precision.”
Tanniello, 866 F.2d at 544. The Defendant
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620_ Filed 02/25/22 Page17 of 21
public hearing with input from counsel. The parties may submit questions consistent with this
ruling, including what the Court holds in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document620 _ Filed 02/25/22 Page4of21
sexually abused as a child” as a basis for a broader hearing beyond inquiry into Juror 50.
Maxwell Br. at 21, 49.
II. Motion for a new tr
Case peneeeieees ememenees 6083 et asPagenas of 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 605 _ Filed 03/18/13 Page 10 of 41
conversations with David Parse, that the steps of the transactions had to be co
Case peneeeieees ememenees COTE each agenes of 117
Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP Document 605 Filed 03/18/13 Page 3 of 41
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERIC
Case eee ee ee EE EOS ee seagteige! Bot 130
February 15, 2012
96:25;238:5
Sternheim (30)
4:23,24,25;5:8, 10,22,
24,6:3 6;54:1 ,2,3;84:12,
14,17;97:5,7,9,22,25:
98:22,25;99:7;101:9,11,
13;108:1,3;129
Case sceeteclieceeltiaceieieiiy (a7. aaa eel of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, y
February 15, 2012 PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
hardcopies (1) | highest (8) 22;226:5;229:19,21; 28:18 included (6)
at 34
Case lee atiadlmeia Ga -7 1-7 a enaeenaeneel of 67
February 15, 2012
C2frdaus
11
}12
13
j14
15
16
\17
‘18
‘19
20
21
22
|23
\24
25
4,
oonwaon ww &® WwW
C2irdaus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PA
Case PAE CIDOS8O- EEL TBO CUA A NE O52 Fil@d@W2/e4/22agePageé 34 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
C2trdaus Conrad - direct Page 169
al
the answer is no.
Q. How did you
Case TASECIOOS8O- EEL TBOOUEA AN o40 Fil@d@W2ea/22gePaged 22 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
February 15, 2012
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - diract Page 121 | C2FFDAU4 Conrad - dir
Case TAECIOOS8O- EAU TBOCUEA AN 639 Filed@zea/22gePageé 24 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v
February 15, 2012 PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.,
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 117 C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct P
Case TAECIOOS8O- EAU TBOCUEA AN O37 FiledW2/e4/22gePaged 39 of 67
February 15, 2012
wot nun &® Wh
OPOPOPO POPOL
PH
Ho
19
/20
21
22
(23
|24
25
C2FFDAU4
ra
oon !louw & WwW Ww
10
v be 8
12
13
14
Case TAECIDOS8E- EEL TBOOUEA AN O36 Filed@W2ea/22gePaged 38 of 67
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, y
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL., February 15, 2012
C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direct Page 105 | C2FFDAU4 Conrad - direc
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document616- Filed 02/24/22 Page 25 of 32
At any hearing it is the Court’s job to evaluate the evidence presented, not present the
evidence. The evidence elicited should be the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 46 of 49
Moreover, there can be no real concern, as the defendant claims, that providing Juror 50
with his questionnaire will “color” Juror 50’
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 45 of 49
into the subject, by allowing [him] an opportunity to fully and fairly brief the Court on the relevant
issues.” (/d. at 7).
In his mo
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 44 of 49
his jury service. These requests similarly call for information barred by Rule 606(b). And the
overbreadth of this information is evid
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document615- Filed 02/24/22 Page14 of 49
Cir. 2006); see also Part II.B.2.a, infra. The McDonough test is “an exacting hurdle” because
“motions to set aside a jury verdict are
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 11 of 30
Juror ID: re,
21a. If yes, is there anything about that experience that would prevent you from acting as |
a fair and impartial jur
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 66
The submissions by Juror No. 50 have questionable merit, have not been ruled
upon, and implicate an ongoing investigation by the partie
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613 _ Filed 02/24/22 Page 59 of 66
F.3d 271, 278 (3d Cir. 2012). Juror No. 50 is not a party here and there is no legal basis
for Juror No. 50 to intervene in this matt
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613_ Filed 02/24/22 Page 60 of 66
sought to distance himself from his original statements, attempted to destroy evidence,
and tried to flee from the media.
Under analo
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613 _ Filed 02/24/22 Page 55 of 66
experiences, he would have been excused, if not for cause, then as a defense peremptory
strike.
II. The scope of any evidentiary hea
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 4 of 66
Table of Authorities
Cases
Adams v. Texds, 448 U.S. 38 (1980) 00... ceeceescecesecesceecnsecesneesssecsseersneecsaeeesneeenaeceseeesneee
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page2of5
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
January 13, 2022
Page 2
matter. The request is not to intervene by a journalist for public access. See Unit
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 612 Filed 02/24/22 Page4of5
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
January 13, 2022
Page 4
There exists no compelling reason to release Juror 50’s pleadings. Any public relea
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 27 of 37
Tr. 41:7-16 (emphasis added). The government was correct that the proof at trial established, at
most, a single decade-long conspiracy
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 26 of 37
United States v. Estrada, 320 F.3d 173, 180-81 (2d Cir. 2003) (citing the “Korfant factors” from
United States v. Korfant, 771 F.2d 66
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 25 of 37
Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment because they subject a person to punishment
for a single crime more than once. United St
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 24 of 37
a part and furtherance of their scheme to abuse minor victims, [Ms. Maxwell] and Jeffrey
Epstein enticed and caused minor victims to t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 21 of 37
charged offense and created a substantial likelihood that Ms. Maxwell was convicted of a crime
other than the one alleged in the Indic
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 14 of 37
sufficient for the defendant to show simply that the proof at trial diverged from the allegations in
the indictment. To establish a co
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 13 of 37
specific showing of prejudice.” /d. at *20 (quoting United States v. D’Amelio, 683 F.3d 412, 417
(2d Cir. 2012)).
Although the Second
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document600_ Filed 02/11/22 Page 12 of 37
The defense followed up with a letter requesting that the Court give the jury the
following additional instruction to avoid a convicti
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document596- Filed 02/11/22 Page5of7
Order, via email on or before February 16, 2022. Because this Order resolves the scope of
redactions for all filings related to the motion,
CaGase2D20-0888G32ARJN Dooouren69S0 Filed 02/08/22 PARggSHb!11
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
February 1, 2022
Page 6
There is a substantial probability that Ms. Maxwell’s fair trial rights will be
CaGase2D20-0088GR2ARJN Dooouren69S0 Filed 02/08/22 PBRgge Db911
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
February 1, 2022
Page 7
2008, No. 08-M-208 (DRH), 2008 WL 5667021, at *4 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2008) (decl
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document590 _ Filed 02/01/22 Page/7of9
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
February 1, 2022
Page 7
2008, No. 08-M-208 (DRH), 2008 WL 5667021, at *4 (N.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2008) (declin
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document590 _ Filed 02/01/22 Page6éof9
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
February 1, 2022
Page 6
There is a substantial probability that Ms. Maxwell’s fair trial rights will be p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document566- Filed 12/28/21 Page4of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
December 27, 2021
Page 4
Despite the government’s confidence, Court Exhibit #15 indicates that the jury is
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document566- Filed 12/28/21 Page2of7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
December 27, 2021
Page 2
Constructive Amendment / Variance
First, without further instruction, the jury co
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document565- Filed 12/19/21 Page 41 of 83
Instruction No. 31: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws —
Conspiracy and Substanti
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document565- Filed 12/19/21 Page 22 of 83
Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity — First
Element
The first elem
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document563_ Filed 12/18/21 Page 123 of 167
Instruction No. 31: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws —
Conspiracy and Substan