Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document563_ Filed 12/18/21 Page 104 of 167
Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity — First
Element
The first el
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document563 _ Filed 12/18/21 Page 43 of 167
Instruction No. 31: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws —
Conspiracy and Substan
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document563_ Filed 12/18/21 Page 24 of 167
Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in legal Sexual Activity — First
Element
The first eleme
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 41 of 82
Instruction No. 31: Counts One, Three, and Five: Conspiracy to Violate Federal Laws —
Conspiracy and Substantiv
10
11
[2
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document562- Filed 12/17/21 Page 28 of 82
Instruction No. 20: Count Four: Transportation of a Minor to Engage in Illegal Sexual
Acti
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document562 Filed 12/17/21 Page 22 of 82
Instruction No. 15: Count Two: Enticement to Engage in Illegal Sexual Activity — First
Element
The first eleme
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document556 - Filed 12/19/21 Pagelof2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
Ne
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
Ww
a
OY
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 12 of 24 24
LB1TMAX1
ability to prove its case beyond a reasonable doub
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1
LB1TMAX1
New York.
Similarly,
Filed 12/
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1
Filed 12/17/21
Page 8 of 24 20
LB1TMAX1
1 did not have an alibi and suggested that a photo lineup was
2 unduly suggestive. 799 F.2d 593, (10th Cir. 1986). Th
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
Ww
a
OY
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 10 of 24 22
LB1ITMAX1
ubstantially confuse and delay the trial. The evid
be
N
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
WO
a
oO
=
be
N
Ww
=
Hs
Oo
a
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke)
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 549-1 Filed 12/17/21 Page 3 of 24 15
LB1ITMAX1
to reha
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document549 Filed 12/17/21 Page2of2
(11/01/21 Tr. at 16 (citing United States v. Saldarriaga, 204 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2000))), that the
government “had an improper motive” (id. (c
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document548- Filed 12/15/21 Page4of6
breaking nature of the Defense’s request, which was made not pre-trial, as was the Government’s
request for the use of pseudonyms, but inst
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document545 - Filed 12/15/21 Page2of9
established and cannot be established without infringing on privilege. Finally, even ifthe proposed
testimony were relevant to some minima
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 536
Filed 12/10/21
Page 6of43 6
LBNAMAXTps
1 in my life, think you can come to point of agreement, can't
2 you?
3 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor. Indeed we told the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 533-2 Filed 12/09/21 Page 2 of 19
JISTRICT COURT
CT OF NEW YORK
UFFRE
Plaintiff,
Case No.:
-against- 15—-ov—-0 743 3-BWS
SLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendants.
io te ON F
V
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LBF3MAXC
understanding that the government wil
victims
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LBF3MAXC
subpoena,
Honor would like to proceed we don't
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document529 _ Filed 12/08/21 Page12 of18
LBF 3MAXC
that in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document524 Filed 12/05/21 Page2of2
Accordingly, the Government respectfully requests that the Court inform the jury that the
Government and Witness-3 are simply following the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document523 Filed 12/04/21 Page2of9
....”’). The “standard of relevance established by the Federal Rules of Evidence is not high.”
United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F.2d 13
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document515 Filed 11/28/21 Pagelof1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ee
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #;
DATE FILED:
United States of America,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document513 Filed 11/29/21 Pagelof1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 11/27/21
United Sta
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document507-1 Filed 11/24/21 Page14of15
Comey, Moe, Pomerantz and Rohrbach
November 1, 2021
Page 13
the limits to the information that can be gleaned from the metadata. Mr. Ke
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document507-1 Filed 11/24/21 Page15of15
Comey, Moe, Pomerantz and Rohrbach
November 1, 2021
Page 14
H. Jennifer Naso
Ms. Naso is a Forensic Document Examiner who worked for a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document507 Filed 11/24/21 Page 26 of 28
Accordingly, the Court should preclude expert testimony from Kelso and Lopez unless and
until the defense to provides supplemental expe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document507- Filed 11/24/21 Page 25 of 28
See United States v. Lebedev, 932 F.3d 40, 50 (2d Cir. 2019) (concluding that “an account and
litigation consultant” who “summar[ized]
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 504
SMITH |VILLAZOR
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
November 23, 2021 DATE FILED:_11/24/21
BY E-MAIL to [email protected]
The Hono
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document503 Filed 11/24/21 Pagelof1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | USDC SDNY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 11/24/21
United S
fe
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke}
a
oO
a
fe
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
LBAGmax2
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 499-2
Rocchio - Dire
Filed 11/23/21
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 352 of 375
Remma Investigations Inc. — Enrolled Agent, Financial and Private Investigator
June 2013 — October 2014
As an independent consult
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 353 of 375
e Instructor at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC) and
conducted seminars/presentations relating to search warran
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 337 of 375
Author of Amicus Brief in Matter of Robert Gorghan v. DeAngelis et al., New York
State Court of Appeals (September, 2006).
Author
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 332 of 375
Reporters Under Subpoena, National Law Journal, January 10, 2005
Cracking Justice’s Facade, National Law Journal, October 11, 200
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 328 of 375
Sanctioning Prosecutorial Misconduct, Bronx County Bar Journal 19 (Winter, 1985)
U.S. Supreme Court Deals with Prosecutorial Misc
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 14 of 375
Comey, Moe, Pomerantz and Rohrbach
November 1, 2021
Page 13
the limits to the information that can be gleaned from the metadata. M
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 499-1 Filed 11/23/21 Page 15 of 375
Comey, Moe, Pomerantz and Rohrbach
November 1, 2021
Page 14
H. Jennifer Naso
Ms. Naso is a Forensic Document Examiner who worked
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 496 Filed 11/22/21 Pagelof2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT USDC SDNY
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 1
United States of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 494 _ Filed 11/22/21 Page1of12
y= 800 Third Avenue
| COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022
+1 212 957 7600 phone
www.cohengresser.com
Christian R. Everdell
+1 (212)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 493 Filed 11/22/21 Page4of6
Page 4
not be satisfied as to that business. But the harms to the business would be directly and proximately
caused by actions taken in fu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 493 Filed 11/22/21 Page2of6
Page 2
of an offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(2). That section also expressly includes, in conspiracy cases,
“any person directly harmed by t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 493 Filed 11/22/21 Page1of6
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 492 Filed 11/22/21 Page8of13
Page 8
the defendant knew that, when she arranged for a young girl—such as Minor Victim-1 or Minor
Victim-4— to give Epstein a massage, t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 492 Filed 11/22/21 Page6of13
Page 6
| the same time period, and in some of the same places.
The fact that Minor Victim-3 was above the age of consent in relevant jur
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 492 Filed 11/22/21 Page5of13
Page 5
charged in the Indictment. But even if it is not, it is certainly admissible under Rule 404(b).
A. Direct Evidence
As the Govern
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 492 Filed 11/22/21 Pagel1of13
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
Ne
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 487 Filed 11/22/21 Page7of8
Page 7
operations of the EVCP. (Def. Mot. at 5 (“Lawyers for Accuser-2 and Witness-3 were instrumental
in creating and structuring the ter
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 487 Filed 11/22/21 Page8sof8
Page 8
rule as a discovery device.” United States v. Cuthbertson, 630 F.2d 139, 144 (3d Cir. 1980); see
Ulbricht, 858 F.3d at 109. Such a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 487 Filed 11/22/21 Page6éof8
Page 6
Victims’ submissions to the EVCP did not discuss the defendant, a criminal case against the
defendant would not advance their clai