Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 23 of 34
contacts with Boies Schiller on the topic of Epstein any more than he shared the contacts on the
topic of Maxwell—he simply denied any
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 20 of 34
I want to make sure I'm not in a Chemical Bank{'>] kind of situation, so I would
like to know about contacts between the United States
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 22 of 34
disclosed the Boies Schiller contacts for the reasons given above. And if Judge McMahon meant
“subject” to have its everyday meaning,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 _ Filed 05/20/21 Page 19 of 34
For one thing, the government admits that Giuffre’s attorneys turned over several
documents in 2016, which were in the government’s
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 13 of 34
for defamation for denying she had trafficked and abused Giuffre—were focused only on Epstein
and not on Maxwell.
Despite AUSA JJ con
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page 6 of 34
Ghislaine Maxwell submits this reply in support of her Motion to suppress all evidence
the government obtained from a grand jury subpoe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 285 Filed 05/20/21 Page1of34
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
y 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document277 Filed 05/11/21 Pagelof2
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT as
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK neem
United States of America,
_y_
20-CR-330 (AJN)
Ghisl
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document275 Filed 05/10/21 Page2of5
Page 2
The Government respectfully requests that the new trial date be scheduled for November
29, 2021, which is only three weeks after the
Cétash: 2Q20rOCk RSP AON Decunmeant27-8 AréelOtold221 Paétege afdf 1
800 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
COHEN & GRESSER LLP +1 212957 7600 phone
UsSbcC SDNY www.cohengresser.com
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONI
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 273 Filed 05/07/21 Pagei1ofi
800 Third Avenue
COHEN & GRESSER LLP New York, NY 10022
+1 212957 7600 phone
www.cohengresser.com
Christian R. Everdell
+1 (212) 957-760
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document271 Filed 05/06/21 Page2of2
Page 2
As to the remaining photographs that are outside the Government’s possession, because
the defendant has copies of those photographs
__ Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 271 Filed 05/06/21 Page 1 of2
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page8sof9
Page 8
thus, that the Court need not resolve Request 10 at this time, as the Court will likely be able to
deny it as moot in the near ter
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page6éof9
Page 6
Second, the request in insufficiently specific. To satisfy the specificity prong, a Rule 17(c)
subpoena must be able to “reasonabl
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page5of9
Page 5
(N.D.N.Y. Feb. 6, 1989) (reaching the unremarkable result that an “undercover agent’s diary” is
“not discoverable in and of itself”
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page4of9
Page 4
Government has acknowledged. In other words, there will be no dispute at trial that Minor Victim-
2 did not write about the defenda
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page2of9
Page 2
The Nixon test is enforced strictly. “The party requesting the subpoena must also show
that the information sought is ‘not otherwis
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 269 Filed 05/04/21 Page1lof9
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew’s Plaza
New
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 266 Filed 05/03/21 Page3of3
this case, any adjournment runs the risk of precluding some attorneys from being able to
participate and/or requiring them to seek adjustme
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 266 Filed 05/03/21 Page1of3
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT |
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ins
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_5/3/21
United State
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page8of9
the Court so that the information may be made available to Maxwell, if appropriate, at the
conclusion of each witness’s direct testimony. S
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page7of9
See United States v. Aguilar, No. CR 07-00030 (SBA), 2008 WL 3182029, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Aug.
4, 2008). Maxwell argues that the materials are
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page6of9
jury subpoena at issue in Request 8; she thus contends that the absence of the documents in that
production suggests coordination between t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page9of9
(collecting cases). As a result, the blanket ruling sought by the Government is improper and
denied.
Ii. Conclusion
The Defendant’s motion
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page5of9
documents are necessary for purposes of impeachment. But as a general matter, the need to
impeach witnesses generally “is insufficient to r
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page4of9
See United States v. Avenatti, No. (S1) 19-CR-373 (PGG), 2020 WL 86768, at *6 (S.D.N.Y.
Jan. 6, 2020). But Rule 17(c) subpoenas are not too
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page3of9
Maxwell’s pending motions to suppress evidence. While ordinarily Rule 17(c) is “trial-focused”
and “may be used only to obtain materials ad
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Page2of9
The purpose of Rule 17(c) is to facilitate the trial by designating a time and place prior to
trial to obtain and inspect evidentiary mater
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 252 Filed 04/27/21 Pagelof9
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #;
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/27/21
United Sta
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 250 - Filed 04/26/21 Page1of3
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 1 6
DATE FILED: 4/26/21
United State
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page16of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 16 of 17
(“A general assertion that certain material ‘might contain exculpatory info
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page15of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 15 of 17
exculpatory. Although BSF does not have the benefit of the ex parte submiss
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page13o0f17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 13 of 17
V. Requests 10 and 11: Boots and Photographs
As to Requests 10 and 11, fo
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page12of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 12 of 17
the relevant pages do not mention her, she needs no more than the relevant p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page11of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 11 of 17
No. 138 at 2 n.2. Again, however, the Defendant does not explain why Maria
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page9of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 9 of 17
appears to be BSF, including all communications between the Government and BSF
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page8of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 8 of 17
Requests themselves. Resp. Ltr. at 7. In Requests 3 through 5, the Defendant se
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 _ Filed 04/23/21 Page /7of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 7 of 17
BSF, and her motion to dismiss for pre-indictment delay is based on the tim
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page6of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 6 of 17
v. Rajaratnam, 753 F. Supp. 2d 317, 320 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (Rule 17(c) “was not in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page5of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 5 of 17
The Defendant argues that Requests | through 5 are not a fishing expedition mer
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page4of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 4 of 17
the Requests themselves ask for “communications” between BSF and a designated p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page3of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 3 of 17
discussion of corruption in amateur basketball; and (3) that took place within
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page2of17
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
April 5, 2021
Page 2 of 17
she may not use Rule 17 to circumvent Rule 16. For this reason and the additiona
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 247 Filed 04/23/21 Page1of17
BOIES
SCHILLER
Ces LEXNER
Sigrid S. McCawley
Telephone: (954) 377-4223
Email: [email protected]
April 5, 2021
VIA EMAIL (FILED UNDER
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Page12o0f13
The Hon. Alison J. Nathan
April 22, 2021
Page 12
the defendant to consult with a contrary expert regarding the newly added count regard
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Page5of13
The Hon. Alison J. Nathan
April 22, 2021
Page 5
would mandate a continuance. Ms. Maxwell must now: search various records (to the extent
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Page6of13
The Hon. Alison J. Nathan
April 22, 2021
Page 6
are minimal. See United States v. Rojas-Contreras, 474 U.S. 231, 234 (1985) (no prejudice
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 246 Filed 04/23/21 Pagel1of13
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c
Laura A. Menninger
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628
www.hmi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 245 Filed 04/23/21 Page1lof2
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c
Laura A. Menninger
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628
www.hmil