Browse by Document Type
Legal (11,650 documents)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 218 Filed 04/19/21 Page3of8
The Hon. Alison J. Nathan
April 15, 2021
Page 3
searches did not occur, witnesses were not interviewed. The government’s modus operandi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 218 Filed 04/19/21 Page2of8
The Hon. Alison J. Nathan
April 15, 2021
Page 2
with Ms. Giuffre’s lawyers to obtain information subject to strict protective orders in
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 218 Filed 04/19/21 Page1of8
Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
150 East 10th Avenue
Denver, Colorado 80203
PH 303.831.7364 Fx 303.832.2628
www.hmil
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 216 Filed 04/19/21 Pagelof2
USiet STh'®
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT eae ee
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #:
| BATE FILEB:_4/19/2021 |
United States of
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 215 Filed 04/19/21 Pagelof1
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ses
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 4/19/21 :
United State
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 213 Filed 04/16/21 Page6éof8
names, but given the government’s recent harbinger of a superseding indictment, likely to
attempt to fix some of these problems, Ms. Maxwe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 214 _ Filed 04/19/21 Page1of3
Uspc SDNY
DOCUMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ga
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK pate Finep T1921 |
United States of America,
_y_
20-
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 213 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page3of8
The Indictment against Ms. Maxwell registers a 98 on the opacity chart. Instead of two
alleged “victims,” the indictment here has differe
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 213 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page2of8
The government continues to stonewall Ms. Maxwell’s requests for clarity about what it
claims she did to justify her continued incarcerat
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 213 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page1of8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendan
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
Document 212 ‘Filed 04/16/21
Certificate of Service
Page 20 of 20
I hereby certify that on March 15, 2021, I served by email, pursuant Rule 2(B) of the
Court’s individual pr
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 16 of 20
Maxwell with perjury.* There are compelling reasons, therefore, to think the government and
Boies Schiller collaborated and that Boies
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document212 Filed 04/16/21 Page14 of 20
But that’s doubtless because that law has been clear for forty-two years that the
government can modify a civil Protective Order and the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 13 of 20
modification of the Protective Order in an ex parte hearing (chock full of misrepresentations)
without first providing Maxwell notice a
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 12 of 20
Maxwell’s two deposition transcripts, Resp. at 94 & n.41. And as to Count 6 in particular
(alleging perjury in the July 2016 deposition
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document212 Filed 04/16/21 Page11 of 20
Second, the government’s inevitable discovery doctrine is far too speculative. The
“typical application” of the inevitable discovery doc
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10 of 20
B. There is no good faith.
The rebuttal to government’s good faith claim is simple: There can be no good faith
when the government wi
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 9of20
In addition to the inapplicability of the third-party doctrine, the government’s response
fails to account for two other, dispositive fac
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 20
investigation firm). “The governing rule in these circumstances is that the possessor of the
claimed privilege or right may intervene t
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page6of20
Ghislaine Maxwell moves under the Fourth Amendment, Martindell v. Int'l Tel. & Tel.
Corp., 594 F.2d 291 (2d Cir. 1979), and the Fifth Amen
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3of20
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
leipopeemenl ep aegis A VF OD DE Od Co i carne intl cain i eid Z
Carpentier. Liiiied Sates, 130 5%, TA, 2206
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 212 Filed 04/16/21 Page1of20
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
R
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document211 Filed 04/16/21 Page9of11
Jackman” (and unlike Barlow): The underrepresentation occurred because the government used
a White Plains grand jury knowing that doing so
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 211 Filed 04/16/21 Page7of11
sitting in the same community where the case will be tried avoids a situation where one
community charges the defendant but a different co
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document211 Filed 04/16/21 Page5of11
The government thus raises only two points of dispute. First, it claims that even though
the offenses in the Superseding Indictment (“Indic
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document211 Filed 04/16/21 Page4of11
Ghislaine Maxwell respectfully submits this Reply Memorandum in Support of her
Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment as It Was Obtai
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document211 Filed 04/16/21 Page1ofi1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
eee ee ee a ee = = = = x
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
V.
GHISLAI
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 210 Filed 04/16/21 Page3of6
motion can be determined without a trial on the merits.” See United States v. Dervishaj, 787 F.
App'x 12, 15 (2d Cir. 2019), cert. denied,
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 210 Filed 04/16/21 Page4of6
defect by requiring the government to elect which of the conspiracy charges it will move forward
with and dismiss the remaining conspiracy
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 210 Filed 04/16/21 Page2of6
The government does not dispute that Counts 1 and 3 charge Ms. Maxwell with the same
crime, conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, nor
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 210 Filed 04/16/21 Page1of6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Vv.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 209 Filed 04/16/21 Page3of5
allegations in the indictment continues to prejudice Ms. Maxwell’s ability to investigate and
defend this matter. It is fundamentally unfai
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 209 Filed 04/16/21 Page1lof5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
R
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 11 of 15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2015 Page 10 of 14
Jane Doe #3’s and Jane Doe #4’s participation i
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 10of 15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2015 Page 9 of 14
The new victims will establish at trial that the
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page9of15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2015 Page 8 of 14
The acts Epstein committed against Jane Doe #4, cons
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page /7of15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2015 Page 6 of 14
young as twelve) to the United States for sexual p
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208-2 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3of15
Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 280 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/02/2015 Page 2 of 14
As the Court is aware, more than six years ago, Jan
Cas€ OSB EAA CrQOBAMPACcunkoeUMENEAQSeh; ones OA Glelo 4 Page to Pb4e 9 of 10
id. at 10). Petitioners do not contend that Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4’s “participation in this
case” can only be achieved
CascGASE-4:2950609890-PAR umbecument 2084 on FilethO4¥Le4b4/oPage 8 Of dde 7 of 10
issue, the Court finds that its action of striking the lurid details from Petitioners’ submissions is
sanction enoug
CasGASS-A:295 9B O9890- Pak umbocument 20Bsd on FileO4L66244/0Pade 2 Bdge 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.:08-CV-80736-KAM
JANE DOE | and JANE DOE 2,
Peti
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 12 of 16
one “conditions” questions were all medical in nature. The twenty-second and twenty-third
questions, however, inquired about convictio
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page11of16
The government complains that Ms. Maxwell has not cited any cases where a perjury
count was dismissed pretrial for “fundamental ambiguity
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page8of16
was sent to more than 6 and probably less than 30 media representatives. The email to the media
members read:
To Whom It May Concern,
Pl
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page 7 of 16
° She “persuaded” Giuffre to go to Epstein’s mansion “in a fashion very similar to the
manner in which Epstein and his other co-conspir
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 208 Filed 04/16/21 Page1of16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
R
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 33 of 34
Given the complexities of the case and the addition of two counts via the S2 indictment, the
Court encourages the parties to agree to
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 34 of 34
The Court ORDERS the Government to confirm within one week whether it considers
any evidence related to negotiation of the non-prosecu
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 29 of 34
Maxwell requests an order directing immediate disclosure of all Brady and Giglio
material and also requests a few specific documents s
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 207 _ Filed 04/16/21 Page 27 of 34
clearly that the allegations are irrelevant to the crimes charged. United States v. Napolitano, 552
F. Supp. 465, 480 (S.D.N.Y. 1982